THE RESTRICTIONS OF THE RIGHT TO INSPECT THE CASE FILE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA IN LIGHT OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Main Article Content

Faruk H. Avdić, M.A.

Abstract

This paper aims to assess the compliance of the provisions of the criminal procedural legislation of Bosnia and Herzegovina dealing with the restrictions of the right to inspect the case file with the standards developed in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. The working hypothesis laid out in this paper is that the right of the prosecutor to unilaterally restrict the defense right to access the case file during the investigation and to unilaterally decide which evidence he will use as the basis for the indictment does not satisfy the requirements stemming from the right to a fair trial. The starting point of this paper is the analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Afterward, the paper turns to the consideration of the provisions of the criminal procedural legislation of Bosnia and Herzegovina dealing with the restrictions of the right to inspect the case file. In that purpose, this paper employs normative and formal dogmatic legal methods in analyzing the particulars of its subject. The conclusion of the paper is that the law of Bosnia and Herzegovina when it comes to the restrictions of the right to inspect the case file is not in line with the standards of the European Court of Human Rights. For this reason, there is a need for the amending of the Criminal Procedure Codes in force in Bosnia and Herzegovina with the aim of making these Codes compliant with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in that respect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Review scientific papers

References

Ambos, K. 2009. Confidential Investigations (Article 54(3)(E) ICC Statute) vs. Disclosure Obligations: The Lubanga Case And National Law. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(4), pp. 543-568.

Bayer, V. 1972. Jugoslavensko krivično procesno pravo: Knjiga prva: Uvod u teoriju krivičnog procesnog prava. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Brants, C. & Franken, S. 2009. The Protection of Fundamental Human Rights in Criminal Process-General Report. Utrecht Law Review, 5(2), pp. 7-65.

Bubalović, T. 2008. Novela Zakona o kaznenom postupku BiH od 17. juna 2008. godine - pozitivna rješenja i iznevjerena očekivanja. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 15(2), pp. 1129-1157.

Bubalović, T. 2012. „Jednakost oružja“ i njegova afirmacija u okviru prava na obranu (regionalni komparativni osvrt), U: Petrović, A. & Jovanović, I. (ur.), Savremene tendencije krivičnog procesnog prava u Srbiji i regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva (normativni i praktični aspekti). Beograd: Misija OEBS u Srbiji, pp. 215-235.

Dodik, B. 2012. Tužiteljska istraga - iskustva Bosne i Hercegovine. U: Petrović, A. & Jovanović, I. (ur.), Savremene tendencije krivičnog procesnog prava u Srbiji i regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva (normativni i praktični aspekti). Beograd: Misija OEBS u Srbiji, pp. 23-42.

Fedorova, M. 2017. The Principle of Equality of Arms in International Criminal Proceedings. In: Rohan, C. & Zyberi, G. (eds.), Defense Perspectives on International Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 204-234.

Grande, E. 2000. Italian Criminal Justice: Borrowing and Resistance. American Journal of Comparative Law, 48(2), pp. 227-259.

Grande, E. 2016. Legal Transplants and the Inoculation Effect: How American Criminal Procedure Has Affected Continental Europe. American Journal of Comparative Law, 63(3), pp. 583-618.

Grubač, M. 2005. Novo krivično procesno zakonodavstvo u Bosni i Hercegovini. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu, 65(11), pp. 531-547.

Grubač, M. 2014. Otvaranje istrage prema novom Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku Srbije. Pravni zapisi, 5(1), pp. 217-234.

Jackson, J. D. & Summers, S. J. 2012. The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kolaković-Bojović, M. 2016. Okončanje krivičnog postupka u razumnom roku. Doktorska disertacija. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Krapac, D. 2015. Kazneno procesno pravo: Knjiga prva: Institucije. Zagreb: Narodne novine.

Krstić, Z. 2015. Pripremno ročište i efikasnost glavnog pretresa. U: Bejatović, S. & Jovanović, I. (ur.), Glavni pretres i suđenje u razumnom roku - regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva i iskustva u primeni. Beograd: Misija OEBS u Srbiji, pp. 154-170.

Marafioti, L. 2008. Italian Criminal Procedure: A System Caught Between Two Traditions. In: Jackson, J., Langer, M. & Tillers, P. (eds.), Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context: Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjan Damaška. Oxford/Portland/Oregon: Hart Publishing, pp. 81-98.

Nožica, S. 2012. Jednakost strana u postupku i pozicija odbrane u krivičnom postupku BiH (praktično iskustvo). U: Petrović, A. & Jovanović, I. (ur.), Savremene tendencije krivičnog procesnog prava u Srbiji i regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva (normativni i praktični aspekti). Beograd: Misija OEBS u Srbiji, pp. 236-251.

Pajčić, M. 2010. Pravo okrivljenika na uvid u spis predmeta tijekom prethodnog kaznenog postupka u pravnim sustavima nekih europskih država i praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 17(1), pp. 25-52.

Pavišić, B. 2013. Komentar Zakona o kaznenom postupku. Rijeka: Dušević & Kršovnik d.o.o.

Pilić, M. & Rajić, Z. 2021. Instrumenti zaštite procesnih prava obrane u istrazi prema Zakonu o kaznenom postupku Bosne i Hercegovine. Pravni vjesnik, 37(2), pp. 167-187.

Schabas, W. 2015. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sidhu, O. 2017. The Concept of Equality of Arms in Criminal Proceedings under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland: Intersentia.

Sijerčić-Čolić, H. 2012. Krivično procesno pravo: Knjiga 1: Krivičnoprocesni subjekti i krivičnoprocesne radnje. Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu.

Sijerčić-Čolić, H. et al. 2005. Komentar Zakona o krivičnom/kaznenom postupku Bosne i Hercegovine. Sarajevo: Savjet/Vijeće Evrope/Evropska komisija.

Simović, M. N. 2013. Osnovne karakteristike sistema krivične istrage u zakonodavstvu Bosne i Hercegovine i njen uticaj na pojednostavljenje krivičnog postupka. U: Jovanović, I. & Stanisavljević, M. (ur.), Pojednostavljene forme postupanja u krivičnim stvarima - regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva i iskustva u primeni. Beograd: Misija OEBS u Srbiji, pp. 236-251.

Škulić, M. 2013. Odnos načela istine i pojednostavljenih formi krivičnog postupka. U: Jovanović, I. & Stanisavljević, M. (ur.), Pojednostavljene forme postupanja u krivičnim stvarima - regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva i iskustva u primeni. Beograd: Misija OEBS u Srbiji, pp. 67-85.

Škulić, M. 2016. Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu - Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje.

Šljivar, D. 2014. Da li je uspostavljena ravnopravnost optužbe i odbrane u krivičnim postupcima u Bosni i Hercegovini i Republici Srbiji (pravni i stvarni položaj odbrane). U: Ivanović, A. R. (ur.), Razmena teorijskih znanja i praktičnih iskustava vezanih za rad po modelu tužilačke istrage i konceptu adverzalnog krivičnog postupka. Novi Pazar: Departman za pravne nauke Internacionalnog Univerziteta u Novom Pazaru/Internacionalna asocijacija kriminalista Banja Luka/Misija OEBS u Srbiji, pp. 248-269.

Trechsel, S. 2005. Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. New York: Oxford University Press.

Weigend, T. 2013. Germany. In: Ligeti. K., (ed.), Toward a Prosecutor for the European Union, Volume 1: A comparative Analysis. London: Hart Publishing, pp. 264-306.

Zappala, S. 2004. The Prosecutor’s duty to disclose exculpatory materials and the recent amendment of Rule 68 ICTY RPE. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2(2), pp. 620-630.

Pravni izvori

Konvencija o zaštiti ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda. Dostupno na: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_BOS.pdf.

Zakon o krivičnom postupku Bosne i Hercegovine, Službeni glasnik BiH, br. 3/2003, 32/200, 36/2003, 26/2004, 63/2004, 13/2005, 48/2005, 46/2006, 29/2007, 53/2007, 58/2008, 12/2009, 16/2009, 53/2009, 93/2009, 72/2013 i 65/2018.

Odluke Evropskog suda za ljudska prava

Atlan v. the United Kingdom, ECtHR, no. 36533/97, Judgment of 19 June 2001. Dostupno na: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2001/397.html, (22. 9. 2021).

Doorson v. the Netherlands, ECtHR, Judgment of 26 March 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II. Dostupno na: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/1996/14.html, (22. 9. 2021).

Dowsett v. the United Kingdom, ECtHR, no. 39482/98, Judgment of 24 June 2003, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2003-VII. Dostupno na: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2003/314.html, (22. 9. 2021).

Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom [GC], ECtHR, nos. 39647/98 & 40461/98, Judgment of 27 October 2004, ECtHR 2004-X. Dostupno na: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2004/560.html, (22. 9. 2021).

Fitt v. the United Kingdom, ECtHR, no. 29777/96, Judgment of 16 February 2000, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2000-II. Dostupno na: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2000/89.html, (22. 9. 2021).

Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], ECtHR, no. 27052/95, Judgment of 16 February 2000. Dostupno na: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2000/90.html, (22. 9. 2021).

Leas v. Estonia, ECtHR, no. 59577/08, Judgment of 6 March 2012. Dostupno na: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/392.html, (22.9. 2021).

Matanović v. Croatia, ECtHR, no. 2742/12, Judgment of 4 April 2017. Dostupno na: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2017/312.html, (22. 9. 2021).

Natunen v. Finland, ECtHR, no. 21022/04, Judgment of 31 March 2009. Dostupno na: http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/2066.html&query=natunen+and+finland+and+21022/048&method=boolean, (22. 9. 2021).

P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, ECtHR, no. 44787/98, Judgment of 25 September 2001, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2001-IX.

Punzelt v. the Czech Republic, ECtHR, no. 31315/96, Judgment of 25 April 2000. Dostupno na: https://international.vlex.com/vid/case-of-punzelt-v-the-czech-republic-26878140, (25. 9. 2021).

Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], ECtHR, no. 28901/95, Judgment of 16 February 2000, ECtHR 2000-II. Dostupno na: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-6101%22]}, (25. 9. 2021).

Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, ECtHR, Judgment of 23 April 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III. HUDOC nos. 21363/93, 21364/93, 21427/93, 22056/93.

Odluke sudova Bosne i Hercegovine

Ustavni sud Bosne i Hercegovine, Odluka o dopustivosti i meritumu, br. AP 1758/15, 30. juni 2015. godine, Službeni glasnik BiH, br. 58/15 (Odluka Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine, br. AP 1758/15).

Ustavni sud Bosne i Hercegovine, Odluka o dopustivosti i meritumu, br. AP 4196/13, 15. januar 2014. godine, Službeni glasnik BiH, br. 19/14 (Odluka Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine, br. AP 4196/13).

Ustavni sud Bosne i Hercegovine, Odluka o dopustivosti i meritumu, br. AP 3850/15, 3. februar 2016. godine, Službeni glasnik BiH, br. 94/14 (Odluka Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine, br. AP 3850/15).

Ustavni sud Bosne i Hercegovine, Odluka o dopustivosti i meritumu, br. AP 2348/08, Službeni glasnik BiH, br. 99/11 (Odluka Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine, br. AP 2348/08).

Vrhovni sud Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine, Rješenje, br. 070-0-KŽ-09-000044, 30. januar 2009. godine (Rješenje Vrhovnog suda Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine, br. 070- 0-KŽ-09-000044).