Universal Jurisdiction Ensuring the Rule of Law in International Criminal Proceedings
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9737-4293
Abstract
This article explores the essential role of universal jurisdiction in enforcing state responsibilities under the ‘aut dedere aut judicare’ mandate, which requires the integration of international crimes into national laws. It posits that universal jurisdiction is a fundamental requirement, not merely an option, for states to effectively meet their international obligations. This necessity extends beyond criminalizing international offences, providing the jurisdictional foundation for international criminal cooperation. The paper examines how universal jurisdiction reflects states’ prescriptive jurisdiction, enabling adjudicative jurisdiction in accordance with due process principles. By emphasizing the critical role of universal jurisdiction in domestic law, the article illustrates how it aids states in adhering to their ‘aut dedere aut judicare’ obligations. This adherence is crucial for national criminalization of international crimes and facilitating effective cross-border legal cooperation, reinforcing justice, accountability, and the rule of law globally. Ultimately, incorporating universal jurisdiction into domestic legislation is vital for states to uphold international legal standards and due process, for operationalizing international cooperation in adjudicating international crimes, and fulfilling state responsibilities in line with the general theory of legal process.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Akande, D. 2011. The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9(3), pp. 485-507.
Akehurst, M. 1972-1973. Jurisdiction in International Law. British Yearbook of International Law, 46, pp. 145-258.
Ambos, K. 2001. Treatise on International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Bassiouni, M. C. 1996. Crimes against Humanity in International Criminal Law, 2nd ed. Kluwer Law International: The Hague.
Bassiouni, M. C. 2001-2002. Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice. Virginia Journal of International Law, 42, pp. 81-162.
Brownlie, I. 2019. Principles of Public International Law, 9th ed., Oxford University Press: New York.
Bu, T. 2023. Comparative and Legislative Research on Legislative Framework for Universal Jurisdiction in China. Science of Law Journal, 2(8). Clausius Scientific Press: Canada, pp. 6-15. https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020802.
Capps, P., Evans, M. & Konstadinides, S. (eds.). 2003. Asserting Jurisdiction: International and European Legal Perspectives. Hart Publishing: Oxford.
Cassese, A. 2003. International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press: New York.
Crawford, J. 2002. The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Fernandez-Jankov, F.F. 2009, Direito internacional penal: mecanismo de implementação do tribunal penal internacional, Editora Saraiva, São Paulo.
Fernandez-Jankov, F. F. 2020b. Pojam međunarodnog krivičnog dela i njegova evolucija. Strani pravni život, 64(2), pp. 95-109. https://doi.org/10.5937/spz64-27256
Fernandez-Jankov, F. F. 2020a. Revisiting the Doctrine of State Jurisdiction in International Criminal Law. Strani pravni život, 64(4), pp. 161-169, https://doi.org/10.5937/spz64-29795
Guilfoyle, D. 2008. Piracy off Somalia: UN Security Council Resolution 1816 and IMO Regional Counter-Piracy Efforts. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(3), pp. 690-699. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20488237, 24. 2. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589308000584
Henckaerts, J. M. & Doswald-Beck, L. 2005. Customary International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Henzelin, M. 2000, Le Principe de L’Universalité en Droit Pénal International, Droit et obligation pour les États de poursuivre et juger selon le principe de l’universalité, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, Faculté de Droit de Genève Bruylant, p. 29.
Higgins, R. 2010. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
Kress, C. 2006. Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes and the Institut de Droit international. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4(3), pp. 561-585. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql037
La Rosa, A.-M., 2003. Juridictions Pénales Internationales: La procédure et la preuve. Geneva: Presses Universitaires de France.
Lowe, V. 2003. Jurisdiction- In: Evans, M. (ed.), International Law, 1st ed., New York : Oxford University Press, pp. 327-385.
Mann, F. A. 1990. The Doctrine of International Jurisdiction Revisited After 20 Years. In: Mann, F. A. (ed.), Further Studies in International Law. Oxford : Clarendon Press, pp. 1-83.
O’Keefe, R. 2004. Universal Jurisdiction. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2(3), pp. 735-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/2.3.735
Randall, K.C. 1988. Universal Jurisdiction under International Law. Texas Law Review, 66, pp. 785-839.
Reydams, L., 2003. Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schaack, V. 2014. The United States’ Position on the Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Obligations: Now is the Time for Change. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2390191, 24. 2. 2024.
Shaw, M. N. 2008. International Law. 6th ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Ssenyonjo, M. 2005. Accountability of Non-State Actors in Uganda for War Crimes and Human Rights Violations: Between Amnesty and the International Criminal Court, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 10(3), pp. 405-434. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=915654, 24. 2. 2024.
Teitel, R. G. 2000. Transitional Justice, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Triggs, G. 2006. International Law: Contemporary Principles and Practices. LexisNexis Butterworths.
Van Schaack, B. & Slye, R. C. 2007, International Criminal Law and Its Enforcement: Cases and Materials, Foundation Press: New York.
Vešović, M. D. 2020. Osnovne karakteristike univerzalne jurisdikcije u savremenom krivičnom pravu. Strani pravni život, 64(3), pp. 7-30.
Waldron, J. 2008. The Concept of the Rule of Law. Georgia Law Review, 43(1), pp. 1-61.
Yokaris, A. 2000. Les Critères de Compétence des Juridictions Nationales, Chapter 73. In: Ascensio, H, Decaux, E. & Pellet, A. (coords.), Droit International Pénal. Paris : Éditions A. Pedone, CEDIN Paris X, pp. 897-904.
Legal Sources
American Convention on Human Rights, "Pact of San José, Costa Rica". San José. Organization of American States, 1969.
Austrian Federal Constitutional Law, 1920.
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, 23 May 1949.
Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, Official Gazette of the Union, 5 Oct. 1988.
United Nations. 1984. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe, Rome, 1950.
Italian Constitution, 1948.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.183/9*, 17 July 1998, ISBN 92-9227-227-6.
Statute of the International Court of Justice, International Court of Justice 1945.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris, United Nations, 1948.
University of Princeton, 2001, Princeton Project on Universal Jurisdiction.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999.
Case Law
International Court of Justice (2002) Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports..
International Court of Justice. 1996. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996.
International Court of Justice. 2012. Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal), ICJ Reports 2012.
Extraordinary African Chambers. 2016. Prosecutor v. Hissène Habré, Case No. 002/2013/EAC, Available at: https://www.eac-justice.org/habre-case, 24. 4. 2024.
Lord MacMillan. 1938. Observation in Compania Naviera Vascongado v SS Cristina, [1938] AC 485 (HL).