United States Sanctions Against Individuals in Republic of Srpska and Legal Remedies
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-4133
Abstract
The challenges posed by unilateral sanctions on the Sustainable Developmental Goals, financial stability, the service provision sector, and human rights have been increasingly debated in recent years. This research focuses on the economic sanctions enacted by the United States of America (USA) targeting individuals in the Western Balkans region, or specifically in the Republic of Srpska. The research is framed in this way for several reasons, including primarily the ongoing Stabilization and Association Process, supported by the effective Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA) between the European Communities, their Member States, and Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). This has imposed the necessity to consider the relevant EU legislation governing sanctions and ways to navigate their adverse consequences. In addition, multilateral sanctions targeting individuals — such as those enacted by the UNSC — have been recognized under international law as part of the collective security framework provided by the UN Charter, while unilateral individual sanctions do not have the same international legal standing. Without intending to evaluate directly these sanctions in terms of international law or human rights law, irrespective of how it is presented, we have identified their key characteristics: they target top-ranking officials, with the legislative activities of the National Assembly as one of the grounds for sanctioning, and they affect untargeted entities including the business and NGO sectors. Those characteristics have decided the inquiry into the legal remedies available. In that sense, we have addressed legal remedies available to BiH and the Republic of Srpska, with a view to specific remedies available to the sanctioned individuals including private persons and legal entities.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
References
Allen, I. 2024. Due Process Boundaries of US Economic Sanctions. New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 26(1), pp. 239-271.
Biersteker, T. J. & Hudáková, Z. 2021. UN targeted sanctions: Historical development and current challenges. Research Handbook on Economic Sanctions. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 107-124. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839102721.00011
Biersteker, T., Van den Herik, L. & Brubaker, R. (2021). Enhancing due process in UN Security Council targeted sanctions regimes. Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/sites/internet/files/2021-09/report_enhancing_due_process_March2021_FINAL%20%281%29.pdf.
Bogdanova, I. 2021. Targeted Economic Sanctions and WTO Law: Examining the Adequacy of the National Security Exception. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 48(2), pp. 171-200. https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2021010
Bogdanova, I. 2022. Chapter 2 The Legality of Unilateral Economic Sanctions under Public International Law. In: Bogdanova, I. (ed.), Unilateral Sanctions in International Law and the Enforcement of Human Rights. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff, pp. 59-158. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004507890_004
Bootwala, M. 2020. The Iran problem: an evaluation of US sanctions on Iran and global reactions. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 21, pp. 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1353/gia.2020.0009
Chachko, E. 2019. Due Process Is in the Details: US Targeted Economic Sanctions and International Human Rights Law, AJIL Unbound, 113, pp. 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2019.25
Cipriani, M., Goldberg, L. S. & La Spada, G. 2023. Financial Sanctions, SWIFT, and the Architecture of the International Payments System. Staff Report No. 1047. FRB of New York. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4336483, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4336483
Dakić, D. 2024. Acquis i ekonomske sankcije. In: Vujisić, D. (ed.), Izazovi I otvorena pitanja uslužnog prava, Tom II. Kragujevac: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, pp. 667-683.
Dupont, P. E. 2019. Human rights implications of sanctions. In: Asada, M. (ed), Economic Sanctions in International Law and Practice, pp. 39-61. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429052989
Golić, D. 2020. Kolektivni šef države i sistem vlasti - bosanskohercegovačka rešenja u svetlu uporednog prava. Strani pravni život, 64(2), pp. 27-42. https://doi.org/10.5937/spz64-26529
Van Rooyen, J. & Nath, A. (2020). Trade Sanctions: A Minor Hindrance or Complete Disaster. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8(3), pp. 74-80. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20200803.14
Khaliq, U. 2018. Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1: Institution Building of the United Nations Human Rights Council, 2007. In: Khaliq, U. (ed.), International Human Rights Law Documents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677117.047
Kreća, M. 2023. Međunarodno javno pravo. 14. dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Moiseienko, A. 2021. Due process and unilateral targeted sanctions. In: Beaucillon, Ch. (ed.), Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107856.00033
Nabti, N.M. 2015. Increasing the Cost of Rape: Using Targeted Sanctions to Deter Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict. In: Marossi, A. & Bassett, M. (eds) Economic Sanctions under International Law. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 43-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-051-0_3
Nguyen, L. Q. T. & Ahmed, R. 2023. The impact of economic sanctions on foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from global data. Journal of Economics and Development, 25(1) pp. 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-10-2022-0206
Orakhelashvili, A. 2015. The Impact of Unilateral EU Economic Sanctions on the UN Collective Security Framework: The Cases of Iran and Syria. In: Marossi, A. & Bassett, M. (eds) Economic Sanctions under International Law. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-051-0_1
Özdamar, Ö. & Shahin, E. 2021. Consequences of Economic Sanctions: The State of the Art and Paths Forward. International Studies Review, 23(4), pp. 1646-1671. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab029
Palević, M. 2022a. Regulatorna podrška platnim uslugama u Evropskoj uniji – odabrani pregled. In: Vujisić, D (ed.), Sadašnjost i budućnost uslužnog prava. Kragujevac: Institut za pravne i društvene nauke, pp. 197-205. Available at: http://institut.jura.kg.ac.rs/images/Projekti/7%20XXI%20vek/Sadasnjost%20i%20buducnost%20usluznog%20prava%202022.pdf (16. 9. 2024).
Palević, M. 2022b. Sankcije i obaveza države kandidata da uskladi spoljnu politiku sa Evropskom unijom. In: Sokolović, S. (ed.), Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske unije. Kragujevac: Institut za pravne I društvene nauke, pp. 105-122. Available at: http://institut.jura.kg.ac.rs/images/Projekti/6%20Uskladjivanje%20PSS/11.%20Uskladjivanje%20pravnog%20sistema%20Srbije%20sa%20standardima%20Evropske%20unije%20knj.%2010.pdf (15. 9. 2024).
Palević, M. & Dakić, D. 2013. Početak zaštite prava na život na Američkom kontinentu. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 18(2), pp. 81-92.
Park, J. & Choi, H. J. 2022. Are smart sanctions smart enough? An inquiry into when leaders oppress civilians under UN targeted sanctions. International Political Science Review, 43(3), pp. 433-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120931957
Radivojević, Z. 2012. Sporazumi o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju u pravu Evropske unije. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu (62), pp. 53-72. Available at: http://www.prafak.ni.ac.rs/files/zbornik/sadrzaj/zbornici/z62/04z62.pdf (16. 9. 2024).
Ruys, T. & Ryngaert C. 2020. Secondary Sanctions: A Weapon out of Control? The International Legality of, and European Responses to, US Secondary Sanctions. British Yearbook of International Law, 0(0), braa007, pp. 1-116. https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/braa007
Simonen, K. 2015. Final Comment: Legal Review of New EU Sanctions Against Russia in Light of Recent Jurisprudence of the European Courts. In: Marossi, A. & Bassett, M. (eds) Economic Sanctions under International Law. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-051-0_13
Shapiro, B. 2008. The Beyond Reasonable Doubt Doctrine: ‘Moral Comfort’ or Standard of Proof?. Law and Humanities, 2, pp. 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2008.11423749
Internet Sources
US Department of the Treasury. 2022. Treasury Sanctions Milorad Dodik and Associated Media Platform for Destabilizing and Corrupt Activity. Available at: https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0549 (15. 9. 2024).
US Embassy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2023. US Treasury Targets Four Officials in Bosnia and Herzegovina for Undermining the Dayton Peace Agreement. Available at: https://ba.usembassy.gov/u-s-treasury-targets-four-officials-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina-for-undermining-the-dayton-peace-agreement/?_ga=2.55850915.963575067.1712127291-635899093.1699044759 (15. 9. 2024).
Legal Sources
Court of Justice of the European Union, Procedure. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7031/en/ (15. 9. 2024).
General Comment No. 8: The relationship between economic sanctions and respect for economic, social and cultural rights 12 December 1997 E/C.12/1997/8 Available at: https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/cescr/1997/en/52393 (15. 9. 2024).
Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 of 18 June 2007, Available at: https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/e/hrc/resolutions/a_hrc_res_5_1.doc (15. 9. 2024).
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI), Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights (15. 9. 2024).
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI), Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights (15. 9. 2024).
Resolution 27/21 (A/HRC/RES/27/21/Corr.1), Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/788446?ln=en&v=pdf (15. 9. 2024).
Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, Official Journal of the European Union, 30. 6. 2015. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:22015A0630(01) (15. 9. 2024).
World Trade Organization. Members and Observes. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm (15. 9. 2024).
World Trade Organization. 2020. Saudi Arabia appeals panel report regarding intellectual property measures. DS567. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/ds567apl_30jul20_e.htm (15. 9. 2024).
World Trade Organization. 2019a. Russia – Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit. DS512. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds512_e.htm (15. 9. 2024).
World Trade Organization. 2019b. United States Measures Relating to Trade in Goods and Services – DS574. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds574_e.htm (15. 9. 2024).
World Trade Organization. 2022. United Arab Emirates Measures Relating to Trade in Goods and Services, and Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights – DS526. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds526_e.htm (15. 9. 2024).
Case Law
Aven v Council, Т-301/22. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=284621&pageIndex=0&doclang=FR&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3620496 (16. 9. 2024).
C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P. Reports of Cases. 2008 I-06351, Appeal Case before the General Court T-315/01
Fridman v Council, Т-304/22, available at https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&td=ALL&num=T-304/22 (15. 9. 2024).