BEHAVIORAL APPROACH TO UNFAIR TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN EU CONSUMER LAW
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Rational choice theory is still at the hearth of EU consumer law. In this paper I consider how this theory reflects on the unfair terms control mechanism set by the Unfair Contract Terms Directive. I identify most pressing problems in the field of unfair contract terms using the findings of behavioral psychology and behavioral economics. In search for possible solutions to these problems I will consult the relevant literature. Therefore, method I use here is a theoretical application of the behavioral findings. In conclusion I will assess which solutions are feasible and most desirable in a short term period, and which are the most effective but demand certain investments and time to become fully functional. Finally, I will conclude that behavioral approach to the issue of unfair contract terms and conditions is an important addition to the policing of unfair terms and conditions which could lead to the raise of overall quality of terms and conditions which is a significant step beyond the control of unfairness.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ben-Sahar, O., “The Myth of the Opportunity to Read in Contract Law”, European Review of Contract Law (ERCL) 1/2009, 1-28.
Engel, M., Stark, J., “Buttons, Boxes, Ticks, and Trust: On the Narrow Limits of Consumer Choice”, in: European Perspectives on Behavioral Law and Economics (ed. Klaus Mathis), Cham 2015, 107-123.
Faure, M. G., Luth, H. A., “Behavioural Economics in Unfair Contract Terms Cautions and Considerations”, Journal of Consumer Policy 3/2011, 337-358.
Marotta-Wurgler, F., “Are “Pay Now, Terms Later” Contracts Worse for Buyers? Evidence from Software License Agreements”, The Journal of Legal Studies 2/2009, 309-343.
Mathis, K., Steffen, A. D., “From Rational Choice to Behavioral Economics: Theoretical Foundations, Empirical Findings and Legal Implications”, in: European Perspectives on Behavioral Law and Economics (ed. Klaus Mathis), Cham 2015, 31-48.
Miller, G. A., “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity to Process Information”, The Psychological Review 2/1956, 81-97.
Radonjić, A., “Unfair Contract Terms and SMEs in BW and Draft CC of Serbia”, Strani pravni život 4/2017, 239-251.
Sibony, A-L., “Can EU Consumer Law Benefit from Behavioural Insights? An Analysis of the Unfair Practices Directive”, European Review of Private Law 6/2014, 901-941.
Legal sources
Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of Council of 25 October 2011, OJ L304/64.
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993, OJ L95/29.
Website references
European Commission, Study on consumer’s attitudes towards Terms and Conditions (T&Cs), Final report, 2016, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/terms_and_conditions_final_report_en.pdf, last visited November 12, 2018.
Helberger, N., “Form Matters: Informing Consumers Effectively”, Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-71, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2354988 , last visited November 12, 2018.
Luth, H. A., Behavioral Economics in Consumer Policy: The Economic Analysis of Standard Terms in Consumer Contracts Revisited (PhD thesis), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 2010, https://repub.eur.nl/pub/19572/Proefschrift-Hanneke-A.-Luth.pdf , last visited November 14, 2018.
Thaler, R. H., Tucker, W., “Smarter Information, Smarter Consumers”, Harvard Business Review 1/2013, https://hbr.org/2013/01/smarter-information-smarter-consumers , last visited November 22, 2018.
Tor, A., “The Methodology of the Behavioral Analysis of Law”, Haifa Law Review 4/2008, https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/836 , last visited September 26, 2018, 237-327.