LOCUS STANDI BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS – A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE

Ivana V. Stjelja

doi:10.56461/SPZ_24205KJ

Authors

Ivana V. Stjelja, PhD Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8964-5427

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_24205KJ

Keywords:

locus standi in administrative disputes, access to environmental justice, the public and the public concerned, legal standing.

Abstract

The main goal of this article is to examine to what extent citizens and their associations as a party in court proceedings can protect the environment in EU countries and Serbia, and also to identify main trends and limitations for access to justice in European legal systems. After analysing the three prevailing approaches to the regulation of locus standi in European countries, the aim of this article is also to determine the extent to which Serbian legislation fits into European legal systems. A normative-dogmatic method and a comparative legal method have been used in this article in order to analyse the legislation and practise in European countries in relation to the right of the public to protect the environment in administrative judicial proceedings. The article focuses on analysing the relevant international and national legislations and their implementation. The way in which locus standi is formulated is the key issue in exercising the right of the (concerned) public to initiate an administrative dispute for the protection of the environment and the protection of participation rights in environmental decision-making. Access to administrative courts in environmental matters usually implies that legal standing to initiate administrative disputes is granted to environmental civil society organisations (the public concerned), although citizens (the public) may also have standing in some cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aragão, A. 2013. Study on the Implementation of Articles 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in Portugal. Brussels: European Commission.

Aragão, A. 2019. Environmental Standards in the Portuguese Constitution. In: Turner, S. et al. (eds.). Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612500.011

Cane, P. 2016. Controlling Administrative Power - An Historical Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316550878

Chevalier, E. & Eliantonio, M. 2017. Standing before French Administrative Courts: Too Restrictive to Effectively Enforce Environmental Rights?. Montesquieu Law Review,5, pp. 65-74.

Darpö, J. 2009. Environmental Justice through Environmental Courts? Lessons Learned from the Swedish Experience. In: Ebbesson, J. & Okowa, P. (eds.). Environmental Law and Justice in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 176-194. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576027.010

Darpö, J. 2013. Effective Justice? Synthesis report of the study on the Implementation of Articles 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in the Member States of the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.

Darpö, J. 2015. Access to Justice in Environmental Decision-making in Sweden: Standing for the public concerned, the scope of review on appeal and costs. Uppsala: Uppsala University.

Drenovak-Ivanović M. 2014. Pristup pravdi u ekološkim upravnim stvarima. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Eliantonio, M. et al. 2012. Standing Up for Your Right(s) in Europe, A Comparative Study on Legal Standing (Locus Standi) before the EU and Member States’ Courts. Strasbourg: European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs.

Etinski, R. 2013. Neposredna primena člana 9, stava 3 Arhuske konvencije u pravnom poretku Republike Srbije. Strani pravni život, 3, pp. 23-44.

European Commission, The Environmental Implementation Review. 2019. Country Report – Latvia. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019SC0124R(01) (29. 10. 2023).

Foulon, J. 2019. Recent Developments in French Environmental Law: Recognition and Implementation of Ecological Damage in French Tort Law. Environmental Law Review, 21(4), pp. 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452919883441

Jerinić, J. 2020. U ime javnosti: legitimacija zastupnika kolektivnih interesa i širih interesa javnosti u upravnim stvarima. Pravni zapisi, 2, pp. 504-531. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-29648

Justice and Environment Network. 2010. Report on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters.

Karageorgou, V. 2018. The Scope of The Review in Environment-Related Disputes in the Light of the Aarhus Convention and EU Law - Tensions between Effective Judicial Protection and National Procedural Autonomy Procedural Environmental Rights. In: Jendrośka, J. & Bar, M. (eds.). Procedural Environmental Rights: Principle X In Theory And Practice, European Environmental Law Forum Series Vol. 4. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 229-260. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780686998.014

Lees, E. 2019. Adjudication Systems. In: Lees, E. & Viñuales J. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198790952.001.0001

Lilić, S. 2014. Upravno pravo i upravno procesno parvo. Osmo izdanje. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Lončar, Z. 2015. Zastupanje stranaka u upravnom sporu. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 4, pp. 1694-1711.

Makowiak, J. 2016. Study on Factual Aspects of Access to Justice in Relation to EU Environmental Law – France. Maître de conferences en droit Université de Limoges. Crideau.

Mikosa, Ž. 2018. Implementation of the Aarhus Convention through Actio Popularis - Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention and Actio Popularis. In: Jendrośka, J. & Bar, M. (eds.). Procedural Environmental Rights: Principle X in Theory and Practice, European Environmental Law Forum Series, Vol. 4. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780686998.015

Milieu Ltd. 2007a. Summary Report on the Inventory of EU Member States’ Measures on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Brussels: European Commission.

Milieu Ltd. 2007b. Measures on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Article 9(3)): Report for Portugal. Brussels: European Commission.

Milieu Ltd. 2019. Study on EU Implementation of the Aarhus Convention in the Area of Access to Justice in Environmental Matters - Final Report. Brussels: European Commission.

Milkov, D. 2013. Upravno pravo III: Kontrola uprave. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.

Nesbit, M., Lucha, C. & Stec, S. 2019. Development of an assessment framework on environmental governance in the EU Member States, Final Report. Brussels: European Commission.

Palmer, A. & Robb, C. 2014. International Environmental Law in National Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rakić-Vodinelić, V. 1989. Ekološka tužba: član 156. Zakona o obligacionim odnosima. Pravni život, 4/5, pp. 878-884.

Rehbinder, E. 2009. Germany in Comparative Perspective. In: Kotzé, L., Paterson, A. (eds.). The Role of the Judiciary in Environmental Governance: Comparative Perspectives. Holland: Wolters Kluwer.

Rodina, A. 2022. Interaction of Sustainability and Environment in the Case Law of the Latvian Constitutional Court, Strani pravni život, 66(4), pp. 411-429. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_22404KJ

Sadeleer, N. de, Roller, G. & Dross, M. 2002. Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Final Report prepared for the European Commission, ENV.A.3/ETU/2002/0030.

Tomić, Lj. 2023. Ekološko-pravni aspekti novog nemačkog zakona o korporativnoj dužnosti pažnje u lancima snabdevanja – ispitivanje dejstva na pravne subjekte u Republici Srbiji, Strani pravni život, 67(2), pp. 211-227. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_23203KJ

Internet Sources

Lavrysen, L. 2021. The French Climate Cases: Legal Basis and Broader Meaning. Gland: IUCN. Available at: https://www.iucn.org/news/world-commission-environmental-law/202102/french-climate-cases-legal-basis-and-broader-meaning (5. 10. 2023.).

Legal Sources

Basic Law of Macao Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China 1999. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b53a0.html (11. 9. 2023).

Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil 1988, with last amendments in 2017. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4c4820bf2.html (11. 9. 2023).

Constitution of the Republic of Angola 2010. Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Angola_2010 (11. 9. 2023).

Constitution of the Republic of Cape Verde 1980, with last amendments in 1992. Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Cape_Verde_1992 (11. 9. 2023).

Constitution of the Republic of Mozambique 2004, with last amendments in 2007. Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Mozambique_2007 (11. 9. 2023).

Constitution of the Republic of Portugal 2005. 7th revision. Available at: https://www.parlamento.pt/sites/EN/Parliament/Documents/Constitution7th.pdf (11. 9. 2023).

Code Civil 1804. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006070721/ (11. 9. 2023).

Latvian Environmental Protection Law 2013. LVA-2013-L-98117. Available at: https://wwwex.ilo.org/dyn/natlex2/natlex2/files/download/98117/Environmental_Protection_Law.pdf (11. 9. 2023).

Law on Administrative Disputes [ZUS], Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 111/2009.

Law on Environmental Impact Assessment, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 135/2004 and 36/2009.

Law on Environmental Protection, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 135/2004, 36/2009, 36/2009, 72/2009, 43/2011, 14/2016, 76/2018, 95/2018 and 95/2018.

Law on General Administrative Procedure [ZUP], Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 18/2016, 95/2018 and 2/2023.

Law on Integrated Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 135/2004, 25/2015 and 109/2021.

Law on Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 135/2004 and 88/2010.

Loi N. 2016-1087 pour la reconquête de la biodiversité, de la nature et des paysages 2016. France.

Umwelt-Rechtsbehelfsgesetz 2006. N. 58. Available at: https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?startbk=Bundesanzeiger_BGBl&jumpTo=bgbl106s2816.pdf#__bgbl__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl106s2816.pdf%27%5D__1590443284109 (11. 9. 2023).

Case Law

Decision of the Administrative Court of the Republic of Serbia of 12. 2. 2021, No. 6063/19.

Decision of the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure of the Republic of Serbia of 1 April 2019, No. 351-02-00063/2019-07, ROP-MSGI-1317-CPI-2/2019 of 1. 4. 2019.

Supreme Administrative Court of Swede Stora Billerud (Sweden); RÅ 1997 ref 38. Available at: www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/a.to.j/Jurisprudence_prj/SWEDEN/SE_RA_1997ref38_Stora_Billerud/Sweden_1997_Stora_Billerud.pdf (23. 9. 2023).

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo da República Portuguesa 2016, No. 1362/12.

Tribunal Administratif de Paris 2021, No. 1904967, 1904968, 1904972, 1904976/4-1. Available at: http://paris.tribunal-administratif.fr/content/download/179360/1759761/version/1/file/1904967190496819049721904976.pdf (5. 10. 2023).