ON THE INSTITUTION OF REPRESENTATION IN PRIVATE LAW
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mandate contract was created in Roman law, thanks to which was regulated indirect representation. The first modern civil codes have acknowledged direct representation based on a power-of-attorney but linked it to a mandate contract.
The power-of-attorney as an independent institute emerged in the late 19th century under German law, with Paul Laband’s theory taking the biggest credit in the separation of the power-of-attorney from the mandate contract In the case of the direct representation, the legal effects of undertaken legal acts directly occur for the represented person. Considering that when undertaking a legal act, the representative declares the will, the question arises whether the declared will should be understood as the will of the representative or the will of the represented. Answering the question, contemporary legal writers tend to see the replacement of the will of the represented by the will of the representative.
Such an understanding of the nature of representation in private law has an interesting origin that dates back to the 13th century.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Di Bello, A. 2010. Sovranità e rappresentanza. La dottrina dello stato in Thomas Hobbes. Napoli: Istituto italiano per gli studi filosofici.
Cvetković Đorđević, V. 2019. Opunomoćavanje kao samostalan pravni posao. U: Lilić, S. (ur.). Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije. Knj. 9, (Biblioteka Zbornici). Beograd: Pravni fakultet, Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje, pp. 211-220.
Cvetković Đorđević, V. 2020. Neposredno zastupanje u rimskom pravu s osvrtom na moderno pravo. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2, pp. 124-144.
Laband, P. 1866. Die Stellvertretung bei dem Abschluβ von Rechtsgeschäften nach dem Allgemeinen deutschen Handelsgesetzbuch. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht, 10, pp. 183-241.
Lobrano, G. & Onida, P. P. 2016. Rappresentanza o/e partecipazione. Formazione della volontà 'per' o/e 'per mezzo di' altri. Nei rapporti individuali e collettivi, di diritto privato e pubblico, romano e positivo", Diritto@Storia, 14. Dostupno na: https://www.dirittoestoria.it/14/contributi/Lobrano-Onida-Rappresentanza-o-e-partecipazione.htm (15. 8. 2022).
Doerner, R. 2018. Abstraktheit der Vollmacht. Berlin: Duncker&Humbolt. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-55396-9
Coing, H. 1989. Europäisches Privatrecht. Bd. II, 19. Jahrhundert. Überblick über die Entwicklung des Privatrechts in den ehemals gemeinrechtlichen Ländern. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.
Eisner, B. & Horvat, M. 1948. Rimsko pravo. Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Hrvatske.
Kaser, M. 1971. Das Römische Privatrecht. Erster Abschnitt - Das altrömische, das Vorklassische und Klassische Recht. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.
Lobrano, G. 2018. Appunti per la lettura delle fonti. L'esempio - da non seguire - della attribuzione della "rappresentanza" al diritto romano". Diritto@Storia, 16. Dostupno na: https://www.dirittoestoria.it/16/tradizione/Lobrano-Appunti-per-lettura-fonti-esempio-attribuzione-rappresentanza-al-Diritto-romano.htm (15. 8. 2022).
Malenica, A. & Cvetković-Đorđević, V., 2018. Rimsko pravo. Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet.
Milošević, M. 2019. Rimsko pravo. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet.
Onida P. P. 2018. "Agire per altri" o "agire per mezzo di altri". Appunti romanistici sulla "rappresentanza" I. Ipotesi di lavoro e stato della dottrina. Napoli: Jovene editore.
Šarac, M. 2011. Mandatum u rimskom pravu. Split: Naklada Bošković.
Watson, A. 1961. Contract of Mandate in Roman Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Windscheid, B. 1866. Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts. Bd. II, Zweite Abtheilung. Düsseldorf: Verlagshandlung von Julius Buddeus.
Windscheid, B. 1887. Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts. Bd. I, Sechste Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Rütten & Loening.
Zimmermann, R. 1996. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
Pravni izvori
Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch 1811.
Allgemeines Landrecht Fur Die Preussischen Staaten 1794.
Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch 1900.
Code Civil 1804.
Digesta Iustiniani
Gaius Institutiones – Gaj Institucije (prevod Obrad Stanojević). 1982. Beograd: Nolit.
Građanski zakonik za Kraljevinu Srbiju objašnjen odlukama Kasacionog suda u Beogradu (sredio Ivan D. Petković). 1939. Beograd.
Zakon o obligacionim odnosima, Službeni list SFRJ, br. 29/1978, 39/1985, 45/1989 - odluka USJ i 57/1989, Službeni list SRJ, br. 31/1993, Službeni list SCG, br. 1/2003 - Ustavna povelja i Službeni glasnik RS, br. 18/2020.