SECURITY OF WORK AS AN INDICATOR OF DECENT WORK – NORMATIVE SOLUTIONS OF COUNTRIES IN THE REGION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_22306KJKeywords:
security of work, indicators of decent work, employment termination, dismissal, workers’ rights.Abstract
International Labor Organization set security of work as one of the basic aspects of decent work. In order to achieve the standard of decent work, it is not enough to have appropriate working conditions, it is also important to achieve that employment cannot be easily terminated by the employer and prevent worker from being exposed to financial instability, that is, social insecurity.
Bearing in mind the increasing spread of flexible forms of work that often lead to a reduction in the scope of security of work, authors’ focus in the paper is dominantly on analyzing the existing problems in the countries in the region regarding the standardization of security of work. The paper analyzes existing solutions in four countries – two which are the members of the European Union (Hungary and Croatia) and two which are not (Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro).
The solutions foreseen in the aforementioned legislations were compared with the solutions from the Labor Law of Serbia, with the aim of making conclusions regarding the possibilities of improving the normative framework in the period of harmonization with the legal acquis of the International Labor Organization and the European Union. The primary aim of the critical review of legal solutions is to recognize certain trends in the regulation of work relations, to analyze existing relations between employers and workers in terms of the labor contracts forms, rights of workers in terms of termination of employment as well as to conclude whether it is possible to preserve the right to security of work in accordance with its traditional elements, given the current circumstances. Authors based the paper on the initial hypothesis that in the observed countries the forms of work flexibility actively influence the abandonment of the concept of employment security, as well as that the scope and quality of the rights regarding the termination of the employment in the countries of the region are not harmonized and secondly, that it is more favorable for workers to achieve employment security in the countries that are members of the European Union and that do not recognize work outside the employment relationship.
Downloads
References
Literatura
Bradaš, S. & Reljanović, M. 2019. Indikatori dostojanstvenog rada. Beograd. Dostupno na: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/belgrad/15771.pdf (28. 7. 2022).
Brown, D.K. 2000. International Trade and Core Labour Standards: A Survey of the Recent Literature. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, (43). Dostupno na: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/oecelsaaa/43-en.htm (15. 7. 2022).
Devicienti, F. Naticchioni, P. & Ricci, A. 2018. Temporary Employment, Demand Volatility, and Unions: Firm-level Evidence. ILR Review: The Journal of Work and Policy, 71(1), pp. 174-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917697684
Ghai, D. 2003. Decent Work: Concept and Indicators. International Labour Review, 142(2), pp. 113-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2003.tb00256.x
Hardy, S. & Butler, M. 2011. European Employment Laws - A Comparative Guide, 2nd Edition. Spiramus Press: Great Britain.
International Labour Organisation. 2012. Decent Work Indicators - Concepts and Definitions. Geneva.
International Labour Organisation. 2013. Decent Work Indicators Guidelines for Producers and Users of Statistical and Legal Framework Indicators, ILO Manual Second Version. Dostupno na: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---integration/documents/publication/wcms_229374.pdf (15. 7. 2022).
International Labour Organisation. 1982. R166 - Termination of Employment Recommendation. Dostupno na: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:R166 (28. 7. 2022).
Jašarević, S. 2018. Zaštita od otkaza u Srbiji u svetlu međunarodnih standarda i uporedne prakse. Radno i socijalno pravo 23(1), pp. 71-96.
Kosanović, R. & Paunović, S. 2013. Filozofija dostojanstvenog rada. Radno i socijalno pravo, (2), pp. 119-140.
Kovačević, Lj. 2016. Valjani razlozi za otkaz ugovora o radu. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Kovačević, Lj. 2021. Zasnivanje radnog odnosa. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Misailović, J. 2018. Naknada štete kao posledica nezakonitog otkaza ugovora o radu u pravu Velike Britanije i Republike Srbije. Strani pravni život, 62(3), pp. 197-211. https://doi.org/10.5937/spz1803197M
Misailović, J. 2019. O otkazu i otkaznom postupku. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 114(1-2), pp. 187-203. https://doi.org/10.7251/APDN1901020M
Reljanović, M. & Misailović, J. 2021. Rešavanje radnih sporova. Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo.
Reljanović, M. & Misailović, J. 2021. Radnopravni položaj digitalnih radnika - iskustva evropskih zemalja. Strani pravni život 65(3), pp. 407-432. https://doi.org/10.5937/spz65-33727
Reljanović, M. 2021. Fleksibilizacija i prekarizacija na tržištu rada: redefinisanje radnih odnosa u postsocijalističkom svetu. U: Biti, O. & Senjković, R. (ur.), Transformacija rada: narativi, prakse, režimi. Zagreb: Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku, pp. 81-110.
Reljanović, M. 2019. Alternativno radno zakonodavstvo. Beograd: Rosa Luxembourg Stiftung - Centar za dostojanstven rad.
Silva, M., Martins, L., & Lopes, H. 2018. Asymmetric labor market reforms: Effects on Wage Growth and Conversion Probability of Fixed-term Contracts. ILR Review: The Journal of Work and Policy, 71(3), pp. 760-788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917737506
Skedinger, P. 2010. Employment Protection Legislation - Evolution, Effects, Winners and Losers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805599
Urdarević, B. et al. 2019. Analiza stanja ekonomskih i socijalnih prava u Republici Srbiji. Beograd. Dostupno na: http://cdrsrbija.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Analiza-stanja-ekonomskih-i-socijalnih-prava-CDR-final.pdf (28. 7. 2022).
Pravni izvori i sudska praksa
Konvencija broj 158 MOR o prestanku radnog odnosa na inicijativu poslodavca, Službeni list SFRJ – Međunarodni ugovori, br. 4/1984 i 7/1991.
Direktiva Veća 1999/70/EZ od 28. 6. 1999. godine o Okvirnom sporazumu o radu na određeno vreme koji su sklopili ETUC, UNICE i CEEP (Direktiva Veća 1999/70/EZ).
Direktiva 2002/14/EC o određivanju opšteg okvira za obaveštavanje i konsultovanje zaposlenih u Evropskoj zajednici.
Zakon o radu Mađarske, Act I of 2012 on Labour Code. Dostupno na: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/89886/103370/F373393512/Act.I.of.2012.on.the.Labor.Code.2018.pdf (28. 7. 2022).
Zakon o radu Republike Srpske, Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske, br. 1/2016, 66/2018.
Zakon o radu Republike Srbije, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 24/2005, 61/2005, 54/2009, 32/2013, 75/2014, 13/2017 - odluka US, 113/2017 i 95/2018 - autentično tumačenje.
Zakon o radu Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine, Službene novine FBiH, br. 1/2016, 89/2018.
Zakon o radu Hrvatske, Narodne novine RH, br. 93/2014, 127/2017, 98/2019.
Zakon o radu Crne Gore, Službeni list CG, br. 74/2019.
Cristian Pujante Rivera v Gestora Clubs Dir, SL and Fondo de Garantía Salarial C-422/14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Lj. Reljanović, Jovana M. Misailović

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Institute of Comparative Law

