ON POLITICAL BACKGROUND OF EARLY SERBIAN RECEPTION OF FRENCH SOCIOLOGICAL SCHOOL AND METHOD IN LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/spz64-24816Keywords:
sociological school, sociological method, Serbian theory of law, conservativism, statismAbstract
The aim of the paper is to shed light upon the political background of an early Serbian critic of French sociological school and method in law. Its working hypothesis is that this critic reveals a conservative character of Serbian Staatrechts theory advocated by Slobodan Jovanović, Živojin Perić and their followers. Based on the idea of social consciousness as a source of law, on judicial creativity and the free scientifically based legal research, the French sociological school stood clearly against statist and elitist mainstream of Serbian legal theory which idealized the State as the unique sovereign power in its capacity to create the law. This paper endeavors to contribute not only to a better understanding of the reception of sociological method in Serbia, but also to a critical analysis of the ideological foundation of the 20th century Serbian legal thought.
Downloads
References
Literatura
Božić, M. 2014. Slobodan Jovanović et la tradition du libéralisme doctrinaire serbe: Pour un changement du paradigme. Cahiers balkaniques, 42, pp. 365–396.
Jovanović, S. 1990. Država. Beograd: BIGZ
Marković, L. 1909. O evolucionizmu u pravu. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 6, pp. 416–426; 505–513.
Markovitch, M. 1933. La doctrine sociale de Duguit, ses idées sur le syndicalisme et la représentation professionnelle. Paris: Éditions P. Bossuet.
Nikić, F. 1920. Racijonalizam i socijologizam u pravu. Društveni život, 1/2, pp. 169–183.
Perić, Ž. 1907. Jedan pogled na evolucionističku pravnu školu. Glas Srpske kraljevske akademije, 74, pp. 122–267.
Perić, Ž. 1921. O školama u pravu. Beograd: Izdavačka knjižarnica Gece Kona.
Perić, Ž. 1934. Digijeva gledišta o subjektivnim pravima. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 29(5), p. 361–368.
Perić, Ž. 2012 (1907). Jedan pogled na evolucionističku pravnu školu. U: Basta, D. (prir.), Preobražaji ideje prava – jedan vek pravne filozofije na Pravnom fakultetu u Beogradu (1841–1941). Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, pp. 155-168.
Perić, Ž. 1935. Quelques observations sur le problème des sources du Droit et la fonction de la loi. U: Les sources du droit, in Recueil d’études en l’honneur de François Gény. Knj. 2. Paris: Librairie Sirey Société Anonyme, pp. 227–252.
Spasojević, Ž. 1938. Živojin Perić kao civilista. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 36(1-2), pp. 10–16.
Tasić, Đ. 1935. Metode ili škole tumačenja. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 30(4), pp. 281–287.
Tasić, Đ. 1938. Profesor Živojin Perić kao pravni filozof. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 36(1-2), pp. 16-23.
Tassitch, G. 1934. L’idée du droit social. Revue internationale de la théorie du droit, 8, p. 281–291.
Tucaković, M. 1936. Škole o interpretaciji prava. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 33(6), pp. 543–559.
Tucaković, M. 1940a. Pojam pozitivističkog pravnog pozitivizma i njegova kritika. Pravosuđe, 9/9-10, pp. 333–340; 9/11-12, pp. 401–414.
Tucaković, M. 1940b. Škola egzegeze i njena kritika. Beograd: [s. n.].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Foreign Legal Life
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Institute of Comparative Law
