UREĐENJE PROCESNIH PRAVA OSUMNJIČENIH I OKRIVLJENIH  U PRAVNIM TEKOVINAMA EVROPSKE UNIJE

Marina M. Matić Bošković

doi:10.5937/spz64-25003

Authors

Marina M. Matić Bošković Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/spz64-25003

Keywords:

accused, EU law, right to legal aid, right to translation, right to information, mutual recognition

Abstract

Last two decades EU intensifies regulation of specific criminal law matters, both substantive and procedural. Although the EU was relay on Council of Europe and its instruments, adoption of Maastricht Treaty in 1992 and Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 reveal the fact that the EU will intensify legislative activities in this area. EU legislator was focused on protection of EU interests, improvement of security and strengthening of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. In parallel, the Court of Justice case law and legal instruments were shaping principle of mutual recognition in criminal matters. Preconditions for mutual recognition is mutual trust, to ensures smooth implementation of foreign decisions. In addition, it was necessary to develop minimal standards for protection of suspects and accused rights, as one of the elements of fair trial. After initial failure, in 2010 member states agreed on Stockholm program and Roadmap on strengthening of procedural rights in criminal proceedings. In line with Roadmap, during 2010-2016 six directives were adopted that regulates specific rights of suspect and accused persons. In the article, author analyses scope of directives, as well as case law of Court of Justice. Adoption of directives is important for establishment of legislative framework, but member states have obligation to transpose directives and implement them in practice. Effects of the directives on rights of accused and suspect should be assessed in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Literatura

Bajović, V. 2005. Procesne garancije osumnjičenih i okrivljenih u krivičnim postupcima na nivou Evropske unije. Prilozi projektu Razvoj pravnog sistema Srbije i harmonizacija sa pravom EU (pravni, ekonomski i sociološki aspekti). Beograd: Centar za publikacije Pravnog fakulteta, pp. 384-396.

Voorhout, J. C. 2017. Ineffective Legal Assistance: Redress for the Accused in Dutch Criminal Procedure and Compliance with ECHR Case Law. Ledien/Boston: Brill Nijhoff.

Jimeno-Bulnes, M. 2010. Towards Common Standards on Rights of Suspected and Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings in the EU?, CEPS.

Jimeno-Bulnes, M. 2008. The Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union. In: Guild, E. & Geyer, F. (eds.), Security versus Justice? Police and judicial cooperation in the European Union. Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 171-202.

Klimek, L. 2017. Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in European Criminal Law. Springer International Publishing.

Klip, A. 2012. European Criminal Law. Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland: Intersentia.

Kristen, F. 2011. Special Issue on Changing Approaches to Authority and Power in Criminal Justice. Utrecht Law Review, 11(3), pp. 1–7.

Löof, R. 2006. Shooting from the hip: Proposed minimum rights in criminal proceedings throughout the EU. European Law Journal, 12(3), pp. 422-430.

Peers, S. 2012. EU Justice and Home Affairs Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rap, S. E. & Zlotnik, D. 2018. The Right to Legal and Other Appropriate Assistance for Child Suspects and Accused: Reflections on the Directive on Procedural Safeguards for Children who are Suspects or Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 26(2), pp. 110-130.

Rafaraci, T. & Belfiore, R. 2019. EU Criminal Justice: Fundamental Rights, Transnational Proceedings and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Springer International Publishing.

Ruggeri, S. 2016. Inaudito reo Proceedings, Defence Rights, and Harmonisation Goals in the EU Responses of the European Courts and New Perspectives of EU Law. Eucrim, 1, pp. 42-52.

Sayers, D. 2014. Protecting Fair Trial Rights in Criminal Cases in the European Union: Where does the Roadmap take us?. Human Rights Law Review, 14(4), pp. 733-760.

Sluiter, G., Friman, H., Linton, S., Vasiliev, S. & Zappala, S. (eds.). 2013. International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tiggelen, G. V. & Surano, L. 2008. Study Analysis of the future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union. Brussels: Institute for European Studies, Université Libre de Bruxelles.

Hancox, E. 2013. The meaning of “implementing” EU law under Article 51(1) of the Charter: Åkerberg Fransson. Common Market Law Review, 50(5), pp. 1411-1431.

Cape, E. et al., 2007. Suspects in Europe. Procedural rights at investigative stage of the criminal process in the European Union. Antwerpen/Oxford: Intersentia.

Cape, E., Namorandze, Z. Smith, R. & Spronken, T. 2010. Effective Criminal Defence in Europe. Antwerp/Oxford/Portland: Intersentia.

Cras, S. & Erbežnik, A. 2016. The Directive on the Presumption of Innocence and the Right to Be Present at Trial Genesis and Description of the New EU-Measure. Eucrim, 1, pp. 25-36.

Cras, S. 2017. The Directive on the Right to Legal Aid in Criminal and EAW Proceedings Genesis and Description of the Sixth Instrument of the 2009 Roadmap. Eucrim, 1, pp. 34-45.

Škulić, M. 2014. Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.

Quattrocolo, S. 2015. The Right to Information in EU Legislation. In: Ruggeri, S. (ed.), Human Rights in European Criminal Law – New Developments in European Legislation and Case law after Lisbon Treaty. Springer International Publishing, pp. 81–93.

Internet izvori

Roebroeck, H. 2014. The Directive on the Right to Interpretation and Translation in Criminal Proceedings. A view from the Defence, speech. Dostupno na: https://eulita.eu/wp/qualetra-final-conference-presentations/, (27.1.2020).

Sudska praksa

Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson, C 617/10, ECLI:EU:C:2013:105.

Al-Jubail Fertilizer Co. And Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Co. v. Council, C-49/88, ECLI:EU:C:1991:276.

Baytar v. Turkey, predstavka br. 45440/04, ECHR, odluka od 14.10.2014.

Criminal proceedings against Gavril Covaci, C-216/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:686.

Cuscani v. United Kingdom, predstavka br. 32771/96, ECHR, presuda od 24.9.2002.

K v. France, predstavka br. 10210/82, ECHR, odluka od 7.12.1983.

Kamasinski v. Austria, predstavka br. 9783/82, ECHR, presuda od 19.12.1989.

Lagerblom v. Sweden, predstavka br. 26891/95, ECHR, presuda od 14.4.2003.

Luedicke, Belkacem and Koc v. Germany, predstavka br. 6210/73, 6877/75, 7132/75, ECHR, presuda od 10.3.1980.

Panovits v. Cyprus, predstavka br. 4268/04, presuda od 11.12.2008.

Pishchalnikov v. Russia, predstavka br. 7025/04, ECHR, presuda od 24.9.2009.

Proceedings brought by István Balogh, C-25/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:423.

Salduz v. Turkey, predstavka br. 36391/02, ECHR, odluka od 27.11.2008.

Stauder v. City of Ulm, C-29/69, ECLI:EU:C:1969:57.

X v. Austria, predstavka br. 6185/73, ECHR, odluka od 29.5.1975.

Ocalan v. Turkey, predstavka br. 46221/99, presuda ECHR, 12.5.2005.

Adamkiewicz v. Poland, predstavka br. 54729/00, presuda ECHR, 2.3.2010.

Dayanan v. Turkey, predstavka br. 7377/03, presuda ECHR, 13.10.2009.

Opinion 2/94, 28 March 1996 (Accession by the Community to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms), ECLI:EU:C:1996:140.

Opinion 2/13 of the Court (Full Court), 18 December 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2454.

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 7 May 2015 (1) Case C‑216/14 Criminal proceedings against Gavril Covaci, ECLI:EU:C:2015:305.

Izveštaji

EPRS - European Parliamentary Research Service. 2015. Fundamental Rights in the European Union – Role of the Charter after Lisbon Treaty, PE 554.168.

European Commission. 2010. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe’s citizens – Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme, COM(2010) 171 final.

European Commission. 2011. Commission staff working document – Impact assessment accompanying Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the rights to access to a lawyer and of notification of custody to a third person in criminal proceeding, SEC(2011) 686 final. Dostupno na: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SEC:2011:0686:FIN:EN:PDF.

Fair Trials International. 2012. Defence Rights in the EU.

FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. 2016. Rights of suspected and accused persons across the EU: translation, interpretation and information.

Pravni izvori

Bečka konvencija o konzularnim odnosima, Službeni list SFRJ - Međunarodni ugovori i drugi sporazumi, br. 5/1966.

Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima i osnovnim slobodama. Zakon o ratifikaciji Evropske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, izmenjene u skladu sa Protokolom broj 11, Protokola uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Protokola broj 4 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda kojim se obezbeđuju izvesna prava i slobode koji nisu uključeni u Konvenciju i Prvi protokol uz nju, Protokola broj 6 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda o ukidanju smrtne kazne, Protokola broj 7 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Protokola broj 12 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda i Protokola broj 13 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda o ukidanju smrtne kazne u svim okolnostima: Službeni list SCG - Međunarodni ugovori, br. 9/2003-16.

Council of Europe. Recommendation Rec (2006)2 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the European Prison Rules.

The Council of European Union. Resolution of the Council of 30 November 2009 on a Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings (Text with EEA relevance) (2009/C 295/01).

European Commission. 2003. Green Paper from the Commission - Procedural Safeguards for Suspects and Defendants in Criminal Proceedings throughout the European Union, COM (2003) 75.

European Council. 2010. The Stockholm Programme – An open and secure Europe serving and protecting citizens, OJ C 115; 4.5.2010.

Predlog okvirne odluke o određenim procesnim pravima u krivičnom postupku. Proposal for a council framework Decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union {SEC(2004)491}/*COM/2004/0328 final-CNS 2004/0113*/. Dostupno na: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52004PC0328:EN:HTML.

Uputstvo 2010/64/EU o prevođenju i tumačenju u krivičnom postupku, Official Journal, L 280, pp. 1-7.

Uputstvo 2012/13/EU o pravu na informisanje u krivičnom postupku, Official Journal, L 142, pp. 1-10.

Uputstvo 2013/48/ЕU о pravu na pristup advokatu u krivičnom postupku i postupku po evropskom nalogu za hapšenje i pravu da treće lice bude obavešteno o lišavanju slobode i pravu komuniciranja s trećim licem i konzularnim vlastima u slučaju lišenja slobode, Official Journal, L 294, pp. 1-12.

Uputstvo 2016/1919/EU o pravnoj pomoći za osumnjičene i okrivljene u krivičnom postupku i za tražena lica u postupku po osnovu evropskog naloga za hapšenje, Official Journal, L 297, pp. 1-8.

Uputstvo 2016/343/EU o jačanju određenih aspekata pretpostavke nevinosti i prava učestvovanja na pretresu u krivičnom postupku, Official Journal, L 65, pp. 1-11.

Uputstvo br. 2016/800/EU o procesnim garancijama za decu osumnjičenu i okrivljenu u krivičnom postupku, Official Journal, L 132, pp. 1-20.