FIDUCIJARNI PRENOS PRAVA SVOJINE. JEDNA ILI VIŠE SVOJINA?

Aleksa Radonjić

doi:10.5937/spz63-20473

Authors

Aleksa Radonjić Pravni fakultet Univerziteta UNION u Beogradu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/spz63-20473

Keywords:

trast, fiducija, svojina, fiducijarni prenos prava svojine.

Abstract

Fiduciary transfer of ownership is being introduced in more and more civil law jurisdictions as a reply to increasing popularity of trust viewed as a division in ownership between the trustee and the beneficiary. I used examples of Quebec, France, and Germany to show how these civilian systems deal with the notion of division of ownership. In the first two they use various constructs such as division of patrimony, or no one’s patrimony, while in Germany it seems it is clear that the trustee acquires full ownership over entrusted assets whereas settlor or beneficiary have only personal rights. Also one gets the impression that the focus was at the protection of entrusted patrimony from the creditors. Nothing suggests that due attention was paid to the protection of settlor or beneficiary in case of trustee’s breach of trust and alienation of entrusted assets contrary to the trust instrument. I believe that settlor or beneficiaries should have rights in rem against the trustee and third party acquirers of entrusted assets, and that leads to the concept of fiduciary ownership as a division in ownership between the settlor and the trustee or trustee and beneficiary, essentially it means the emergence of different kinds of ownership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akkermans, B. 2008. The Principle of Numerus Clausus in European Property Law. Antwerp-Oxford-Portland: Intersentia.

Banakas, S. 2006. Understanding Trusts: A Comparative View of Property Rights in Europe. InDret, 1, pp. 1-9. Dostupno na: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1400130 25. 7. 2018.

Benli, E. i Benli, H. E. 2015. Legal and Economic Considerations on the Efficacy of the Civil Law Fiduciary System Compared to the Common Law Trust under the Debates on the Dual Property System. Business Law Review, 1, pp. 5-9. https://doi.org/10.54648/BULA2015002

De Groot, S. (2008). Fiduciary Transfer of Ownership. In: Faber, W. and Lurger, B. (eds.), Rules for the transfer of movables: a candidate for European harmonisation or national reform? Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers, pp. 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866537002.161

Đurić, T. 2011. Fiducijarni prenos prava svojine. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 2, pp. 473-494.

Emmerich, Y. 2013. The Civil Law Trust: a modality of ownership or an interlude in ownership? In: Smith, L. (ed.), The Worlds of the Trust, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139505994.004

Grundmann, S. 1999. Trust and Treuhand at the End of the 20th Century. Key Problems and Shift of Interests. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 3, pp. 401-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/840938

Howard, C. 2006. Trust Funds in Common Law and Civil Law Systems: A Comparative Analysis. University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review, 2, pp. 344-365.

Kovačević, V. 2013. Neka pitanja o prirodi i strukturi pojedinih grana i pravnih instituta engleskog prava. Pravni zapisi, 2, pp. 514-528. DOI: 10.5937/pravzap5-4807. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap5-4807

Lupoi, M. 2000. Trusts: A Comparative Overview. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Pajtić, B. 2012. Harmonizacija domaćih pravnih propisa iz oblasti građanskog prava sa pravom Evropske unije - fiducijarno obezbeđenje potraživanja. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 4, pp. 291-303.

Smith, L. D. 2008. Trust and Patrimony. Revue générale de droit, 2, pp. 379-403. https://doi.org/10.7202/1027041ar

Tuleaşcă, L. 2011. The Concept of the Trust in Romanian Law. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 2, pp. 150-160.

Van Erp, S. and Akkermans, B. (eds.). 2012. Cases, Materials and Text on Property Law. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.

Van Erp, S. and Akkermans, B. (2010). European Union Property Law. In: C. Twigg-Flesner (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to European Private Law , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183-186. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511777714.014

Vladetić, S. 2011. Osnovi trasta anglosaksonskog prava. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 58, pp. 113-126

Pravni izvori

Zakon o finansijskom obezbeđenju, Službeni glasnik RS. br. 44/2018.

Zakon o nasleđivanju, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 46/1995, 101/2003 - odluka USRS i 6/2015.

Zakon o tržištu kapitala, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 31/2011, 112/2015 i 108/2016.

Civil Code of Quebec, Éditeur officiel du Québec, 1991, http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/CCQ-1991 (4. 4. 2018).

Code Civil des français, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?idSectionTA=LEGISCTA000006118476&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721&dateTexte=20180801 (1. 8. 2018).

Insolvenzordnung, 1994. Dostupno na: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/inso/BJNR286600994.html (3. 8. 2018). (Zakon o stečaju Nemačke).

Directive 2002/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2002 on financial collateral arrangements, Official Journal L 168, 27/06/2002.

Konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda Saveta Evrope, 1950 – Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima.

Predlog Zakona o finansijskom obezbeđenju. Dostupno na: http://www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/archive/files/lat/pdf/predlozi_zakona/1276-18%20LAT.pdf (5. 2. 2018).

Nacrt Zakonika o svojini i drugim stvarnim pravima. 2007. Ka novom stvarnom pravu Srbije. Beograd: Ministarstvo pravde.