Bridging the Gap: Applying the PIF Directive in EU Candidate Countries
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-0276
Abstract
The EU manages an independent budget of more than 200 billion euro annually, making it vulnerable to fraud and corruption, which can undermine financial stability and public trust. To combat this, the PIF Directive (2017/1371/EU) harmonises financial crime definitions and mandates enforcement standards, extending to candidate countries including Serbia. This paper analyses Serbia’s compliance with the Directive, testing the hypotheses that despite the legislative reforms, some key challenges remain, notably the lack of a defined ‘EU’s financial interest’ in Serbian law, which hinders prosecution. The analysis also focuses on interagency cooperation and legal alignment with EU bodies such as OLAF and EPPO. Using desk research methodology, the paper assesses Serbia’s legal and institutional framework, offering recommendations to refine legal definitions, strengthen penalties, and enhance investigative capacities, ensuring Serbia meets its Chapter 23 and 24 EU accession requirements.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bellacosa, M. & De Bellis, M. 2023. The Protection of the EU Financial Interests between Administrative and Criminal Tools: OLAF and EPPO. Common Market Law Review. 60(1), pp. 15-50. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2023002
Blanco-Alcántara, D., García-Moreno Rodríguez, F., López-de-Foronda Pérez, Ó. 2022. Fraud and Corruption in EU Funding - The Problematic Use of European Funds and Solutions. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19051-3
Bonelli, M. 2018. The Taricco saga and the consolidation of judicial dialogue in the European Union: CJEU, C-105/14 Ivo Taricco and others, ECLI:EU:C:2015:555; and C-42/17 M.A.S., M.B., ECLI:EU:C:2017:936 Italian Constitutional Court, Order No. 24/2017. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 25(3), pp. 357-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X18773046
Bontempi, V., Rulands, E. K. F., Nato, A., Serowaniec, M., Tati, E. 2022. The Protection of the European Financial Interests: From Concreate Practices to Theoretical Recommendations. International Journal of Public Administration, 47(6), pp. 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2122505
De la Mare, T. & Donnelly, C. 2011. Preliminary Rulings and EU Legal Integration: Evolution and Stasis, In: Craig, P. & De Burca. G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, pp. 363-393.
Grasso, G., Sicurella, R. & Giuffrida, F. 2020. European Public Prosecutor Office Material Competence: Analysis of the PIF Directive and Regulation, In: Ligeti, K., Antunes, M. J. & Giuffrida, F. (eds.), The European Public Prosecutor's Office at Launch, pp. 23-56.
Haupt, S. 2023. EJC: EU Law Protecting the Union's Financial Interests Prevails over National Fundamental Rights. Eucrim.
Herrnfeld, H. H. 2020. The Draft Regulation on the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office - Issues of Balance between the Prosecution and the Defence, In: Briere, C. & Weyembergh, A. (eds.) The Needed Balances in EU Criminal Law - Past, Present and Future. Hart Publishing, pp. 383-413.
Jacsó, J.& Udvarhelyi, B. 2022. The Protection of the Financial Interests of the European Union - European Union Requirements and their Implementation by the Central and Eastern-European Countries. In: Váradi-Csema, E. (ed.), Criminal Legal Studies. European Challenges and Central European Responses in the Criminal Science of the 21st Century. Miskolc-Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing. pp. 371-401. https://doi.org/10.54171/2022.evcs.cls_13
Juszak, A. & Sason. E. 2017. The Directive on the Fight against Fraud to the Union's Financial Interests by Means of Criminal Law (PIF Directive) Laying down the Foundation for a Better Protection of the Union's Financial Interests? Eucrim. pp. 80-87. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2017-009
Kaiafa-Gbandi, M. 2019. Protection of the EU's financial interests by means of criminal law in the context of the Lisbon Treaty and the 2017 Directive (EU 2017/1371) on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests. In: Farkas, A., Dannecker, G. & Jacso, J. (eds.), Criminal Law Aspects of the Protection of Financial Interests of the European Union, with particular emphasis on the national legislation on tax fraud, corruption, money laundering and criminal compliance with reference to cybercrime. Wolters Kluwer, pp. 36-51.
Kostić, J. & Matić Bošković, M. 2022. Diversion of the criminal procedure vs. adequate criminal policy in the field of financial crime in Serbia. In: Restorative Justice, Mediation and Protection of EU Financial Interests Proceedings of the DRAMP Conference University of Perugia, 28-29 April 2022. University of Perugia, Perugia, pp. 153-173.
Kostić, J. 2022. Zaštita uzbunjivača: između javnog i privatnog interesa. Strani pravni život. Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 205-220. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_22202KJ
Maesa, C. F. 2018b. Effectiveness and Primacy of EU Law v. Higher National Protection of Fundamental Rights and National Identity - A Look through the Lens of the Taricco II Judgement. Eucrim. 1, pp. 50-56.
Maesa, C. F. 2018a. Directive 2017/1371 on the Fight Against Fraud to the Union's Financial Interests by Means of Criminal Law: A Missed Goal. European Papers. 3(3), pp. 1455-1469.
Matić Bošković, M. 2024. Protection of EU Financial Interests: EPPO's Cooperation with Non-EU States. Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law, 62(3), pp. 27-44. https://doi.org/10.47152/rkkp.62.3.2
Matić Bošković, M. 2022a. Krivično procesno pravo EU, Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrade.
Matić Bošković, M. 2022b. Cybercrime money laundering cases and digital evidence, Foreign Legal Life, 66(4), pp. 451-467. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_22406KJ
Matić Bošković M. & Kostić, J. 2020. The Application of the ne bis in idem related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts. NBP - Journal of Criminalistics and Law, 25(2), pp. 67-77. https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo25-27224
Miedzińska, M. 2019. Legal aspects of protection of the financial interests of the European Union. European Studies Quarterly, 3, pp. 121-134. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.5845
Raičević, N. 2014. Dejstvo odluke Evropskog suda pravde o prethodnom pitanju. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 68, pp. 825-842. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfni1468825R
Ruccia, N. 2023. The Protection of the EU's Financial Interests in the Next Generation EU: From PIF Directive to RRF Regulation. In: Baumler, J., Binder, C., Bungenberg, M., Krajewski, M., Rühl, G., Tams, C. J., Terhechte, J. P. & Ziegler, A. R. (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law, 14, pp. 347-365 https://doi.org/10.1007/8165_2023_106
Timmerman, M. 2016. Balancing effective criminal sanctions with effective fundamental rights protection in cases of VAT fraud: Taricco. Common Market Law Review. 53(3), pp. 779-796. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2016065
Viorescu, R. 2023. CJEU Decision C-107/23 PPU: Insights on the Protection of the EU Financial Interests and the National principle of "Lex Mitior". European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 10(2), pp. 24-33. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/10.2/206
Vervaele, J. A. E. 2020. The Material Scope of Competence of the European Public Prosecutor's Office: Lex uncerta and unpraevia? In: Briere, C. & Weyembergh, A. (eds.), The Needed Balances in EU Criminal Law - Past, Present and Future, Hart Publishing, pp. 411-429.
Legal Sources
Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 85/2005, 88/2005, 107/2005, 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016, 35/2019, 94/2024.
Law on the Liability of Legal Entities for Criminal Offences of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 97/2008.
Regulation (EU, Euroatom) No. 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euroatom) No. 1074/1999.
Regulation (EU, Euroatom) No. 2020/2223 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 December 2020 amending Regulation (EU, Euroatom) No. 883/2013, as regards cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of the European Anti-Fraud Office investigations.
Regulation (EU, Euroatom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (recast).
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Available at: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/592233, 11. 8. 2025.
Internet Sources
European Council. 2025. EU budget for 2025. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-annual-budget/2025-budget/, 11. 8. 2025.
European Parliament. 2021. Impact of Organised Crime on the EU’s Financial Interests. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/697019/IPOL_STU(2021)697019_EN.pdf, 11. 8. 2025.