Evolutivno tumačenje s osvrtom na recentnu praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u klimatskim predmetima
Bočna strana članka
Glavni sadržaj članka
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4030-8088
Apstrakt
Evolutivno tumačenje jedno je od najvažnijih načela interpretacije koje je omogućilo Sudu da Konvenciju tumači u svjetlu današnjih uvjeta. Na takav način proširuje se opseg zaštite Konvencije, ali se istodobno otvara pitanje dopuštenih granica tumačenja. U recentnoj praksi Sud je utvrdio povredu Konvencije uslijed propusta odgovorne države da razvije i provede normativni okvir kojim bi se ublažile posljedice klimatskih promjena. U tim predmetima Sud je primijenio evolutivno tumačenje s obzirom na to da Konvencija ne jamči pravo na zdrav okoliš ili drugo slično pravo. Autori primjenom normativne i kazuističke metode ispituju je li Sud u svojoj recentnoj praksi u klimatskim predmetima dao jasnije kriterije za primjenu evolutivnog tumačenja. Rezultati istraživanja ukazuju da sudska praksa nije koherentna u pogledu ovih uvjeta pa su granice evolutivnog potencijala Konvencije ostale nejasne.
Preuzimanja
Detalji članka
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Reference
References
Bureš, P. 2017. Human dignity: an illusory limit for the evolutive interpretation of the ECHR?. Amicus Curiae, 110, pp. 20-28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v2017i110.5035 (6. 7. 2024)
Djeffal, C. 2016. Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316339558
Dothan, S. 2019. The Three Traditional Approaches to Treaty Interpretation: A Current Application to the European Court of Human Rights. Fordham International Law Journal, 42(3), pp. 765-794. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3241331 (3. 5. 2024).
Dzehtsiarou, K. 2011. European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights, German Law Journal, 12(10), pp. 1730-1745. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1951371 (2. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200017533
Đajić, S. V. 2019. Mehanizmi defragmentacije međunarodnog prava: sistemsko tumačenje, evolutivno tumačenje i sudski aktivizam Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 53(2), pp. 363-375. Available at: https://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=0550-21791902363Q (3. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns53-23515
Etinski, R. 2022. Evolutive Interpretation of Treaties and Risk of Judicial Legislation. Studia Iuridica Montenegrina, 4(2), pp. 7-31. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/journal-detail?id=2718 (5. 5. 2024).
Greer, S. 2006. The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494963
Greer, S. 2010. The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Universal Principle or Margin of Appreciation?. Available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/human-rights/sites/human-rights/files/greer.pdf (2. 5. 2024).
Hadži Stević, B. 2021. Opravdanost ustavnosudskog aktivizmа zarad zaštite ljudskih prava: Evropski sud za ljudska prava i Ustavni sud Bosne i Hercegovine, Eudaimonia: revija za pravnu, političku i socijalnu teoriju i filozofiju, 5(1), pp. 63-86. Available at: http://epub.ius.bg.ac.rs/index.php/eudaimonia/issue/view/8 (3. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.51204/IVRS_21103A
Hariri, R. 2022. Zaštita ljudskih prava u okviru Vijeća Europe. Diplomski rad. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
Helgesen, J. E. 2011. Dialogue between judges 2011. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Dialogue_between_judges_2011 (5. 5. 2024).
Letsas, G. 2012. The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and its Legitimacy. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2021836 (3. 5. 2024).
Lubura, M. 2021. Pravo na abortus u savremenom pravu i praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Strani pravni život, 65(1), pp. 159-170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/spz65-28264 (9. 5. 2024).
Marochini, M. 2014. The interpretation of the European Convention Human Rights, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 51(1), pp. 63-84. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/116319 (4. 5. 2024).
Marochini Zrinski, M. 2018. Izazovi u primjeni i tumačenju Konvencije u Republici Hrvatskoj. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 55(2), pp. 423-446. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/293135 (1. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2018.55.128.423
Mihelčić, G. & Marochini Zrinski, M. 2018. Utjecaj konvencijskih načela tumačenja na pojedine građanskopravne institute (odabrana pitanja), Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 57(78), pp. 127-147. Available at: https://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=0350-85011878127M (2. 5. 2024). https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfni1878127M
Omejec, J. 2014. Konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda u praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava: Strasbourški acquis. 2. dopunjeno izdanje. Zagreb: Novi informator.
Schabas, W. A. 2015. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199594061.001.0001
Sicilianos, L. A. 2020. Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Remarks on the Court’s Approach. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cahdi/the-contribution-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-to-the-development-of-public-international-law (3. 5. 2024).
Sonnleitner, L. 2022. A Constitutionalist Approach to the European Convention on Human Rights: The Legitimacy of Evolutive and Static Interpretation. Oxford: Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509946907
Tintor, Lj. 2021. Značaj sluačaja Urgenda za razvoj klimatskih parnica na području Evrope. Strani pravni život, 65(2), pp. 249-265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/spz65-31054 (9. 5. 2024).
Tulkens, F. 2011. Dialogue between judges 2011. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Dialogue_between_judges_2011 (5. 5. 2024).
Legal Sources
Konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda, 1950, Vijeće Europe. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Convention_hrv (3. 5. 2024).
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1155, p. 331. Available at: https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf (3. 5. 2024).
Case law
A, B and C v Ireland, Application no. 25579/05, Judgment ECHR, 16 December 2010.
Bayatyan v Armenia, Application no. 23459/03, Judgment ECHR, 7 July 2011.
Carême v France, Application no. 7189/21, Decision ECHR, 9 April 2024.
Christine Goodwin v The United Kingdom, Application no. 28957/95, Judgment ECHR, 11 July 2002.
Duarte Agostinho and Others v Portugal and 32 Others, Application no. 39371/20, Decision ECHR, 9 April 2024.
Dudgeon v The United Kingdom, Application no. 7525/76, Judgment ECHR, 22 October 1981.
I v The United Kingdom, Application no. 25680/94, Judgment ECHR, 11 July 2002.
Johnston and Others v Ireland, Application no. 9697/82, Judgment 18 December 1986.
Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v Hungary, Application no. 18030/11, Judgment ECHR, 8 November 2016.
Marckx v Belgium, Application no. 6833/74, Judgment ECHR, 13 June 1979.
Muñoz Díaz v. Spain, Application no. 49151/07, Judgment ECHR, 8 December 2009.
Pretty v The United Kingdom, Application no. 2346/02, Judgment ECHR, 29 April 2002.
Sheffield and Horsham v The United Kingdom, Application nos. 22985/93 23390/94, Judgment ECHR, 30 July 1998.
Soering v The United Kingdom, Application no. 14038/88, Judgment ECHR, 7 July 1989.
Tyrer v The United Kingdom, Application no. 5856/72, Judgment ECHR, 25 April 1978.
Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland, Application no. 53600/20, Judgment ECHR, 9 April 2024.
X and Others v Austria, Application no. 19010/07, Judgment ECHR, 19 February 2013.