UDRUŽENJA SUDIJA I SINDIKATI – MEĐUNARODNI STANDARDI I IZABRANE NACIONALNE PRAKSE

Ključne reči: sudije, sloboda udruživanja, sindikati, sudijska nezavisnost.

Apstrakt

Cilj rada je da predstavi međunarodne standarde i njihovu primenu u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima u zemljama Evrope u pogledu prava sudija na udruživanje sa posebnim osvrtom na pravo sudija na sindikalno udruživanje.

Autorke pretpostavljaju da, iako nije striktno predviđeno ni u jednom od izvora tvrdog prava, mnoštvo instrumenata mekog prava jasno potvrđuje da sudije imaju pravo na sindikalno organizovanje. Shodno tome, autorke zaključuju da u relevantnim međunarodnim standardima ne postoji ništa što a priori sprečava sudije da se sindikalno udružuju. Pored toga, autorke smatraju da sudije imaju koristi od kolektivnih radnih prava koja se uobičajeno povezuju sa delovanjem sindikata, kroz aktivnosti udruženja sudija, čak i u slučajevima kada je sudijama izričito zabranjeno da se udružuju i osnivaju sindikate. Poslednja tvrdnja je podržana uporednim pregledom prakse u odabranim evropskim zemljama.

Reference

References

Amadeus Wolff, H. 2011. The Civil Service in Germany Annual Report. Ius Pub¬licum Network Review. Available at: http://www.ius-publicum.com/reposi-tory/uploads/07_01_2022_10_04_08b_Wolff.pdf (13. 11. 2022).

Beers, D. J. 2012. Judicial Self-Governance and the Rule of Law. Problems of Post-Com¬munism, (59)5, pp. 50-67, https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216590504.

Bell, J. 2006. Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review. New York: Cam¬bridge University Press.

Böttcher, H.E. 2016. Le syndicalisme judiciaire en Allemagne: du monolith¬isme au pluralisme. Les Cahiers de la Justice, 3(3), pp. 497-508, https://doi. org/10.3917/cdlj.1603.0497.

Castillo Ortiz, P. J. 2017. Councils of the Judiciary and Judges’ Perceptions of Respect to Their Independence in Europe. The Hague Journal of the Rule Law, 9, pp. 315–336, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-017-0061-2.

Corby, S., Burgess, P. & Höland, A. 2021. Employees as Judges in European Labour Courts: A Conflict of Interests? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 27(3), pp. 231-247, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680120906631.

Cristóbal, R.S., 2008. El Derecho de Asociación de los Jueces: Asociacionismo profesional y asociación del juez a asociaciones no profesionales. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, (83), pp. 115-145.

de Haan, W., Silvis, J., & Thomas, P. A. 1989. Radical French Judges: Syndicat de la magistrature. Journal of Law and Society, 16(4), pp. 477-482, https://doi. org/10.2307/1410332.

de Maillard, J. 2016. Syndicalisme et justice: vieille lune ou idée neuve?. Les Cahiers de la Justice, 3(3), pp. 441-455, https://doi.org/10.3917/cdlj.1603.0441.

Fauconnier, G., Husson, A. & Roux d’Anzi, C. 2016. Collective Organizations of Judges and Professional Conduct: A Revived Approach to Judicial Ethics. European Judicial Training Network Themis Competition Semi-Final D. Omšenie, Slovakia, 26–30 June.

Garoupa, N. & Ginsburg, T. 2015. Judicial Reputation: A Comparative The¬ory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, https://doi.org/10.7208/ chicago/9780226290621.001.0001.

Knežević Bojović, A., Matijević, M. & Glintić, M. 2021. International Standards on Judicial Ethics and the Pitfalls of Cursory Legal Transplantation. In: Bal¬kan Yearbook of European and International Law. Springer, Cham, pp. 163- 184, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97431-2_8.

Le Crom, J.P. 2017. Trade unions and labour law in France during the Second World War. Sindacati e diritto del lavoro tra dittature e democrazie nell’Eu¬ropa mediterranea e latina del XX secolo. Attidel convegno Firenze, 23-24 novembre, pp.103-121.

Lemennicier, B. & Wenzel, N.G. 2018. The Judge and His Hangman: Judicial Selection and the Accountability of Judges. ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, 12 (3), pp. 239-256.

Matthes, C.Y. 2022. Judges as Activists: How Polish Judges Mobilize to Defend the Rule of Law”, East European Politics, (38)3, pp. 468-487, https://doi.org/10.1 080/21599165.2022.2092843.

Misailović, J. 2019. Collective Bargaining with Special Reference to the Law of Germany and Republic of Serbia. Strani pravni život, 63(4), pp. 115-124. DOI: 10.5937/spz63-24186, https://doi.org/10.5937/spz63-24186.

Mirić, R. 2013. Bangalorski principi - doprinos razvoju sudijske etike, Strani pravni život, 57(3), рр. 327-342.

Mounier, J.P. 1986. Du corps judiciaire à la crise de la magistrature. In: Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. De quel droit?, 64, pp. 20-29; doi :https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1986.2333. Available at: https://www.persee. fr/doc/arss_0335-5322_1986_num_64_1_2333, (6. 11. 2022), https://doi. org/10.3406/arss.1986.2333.

Rakić Vodinelić, V., Knežević Bojović, A. & Reljanović, M. 2012. Judicial Reform in Serbia 2008-2012. Beograd: Centar za unapređivanje pravnih studija.

Riedel, J. 2020. Judicial Review of Judicial Appointments in Germany. Inter¬national Journal for Court Administration, 11(1), pp. 1-19, https://doi. org/10.36745/ijca.296.

Robert, M. 2016. Le Fait Syndical Dans La Magistrature Française. Les Cahiers de la Justice, 3(3), pp. 417-423, https://doi.org/10.3917/cdlj.1603.0417.

Sánchez, L.M. 2010. La huelga en el poder judicial. Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña, (14), pp. 573-586.

Sanz Llorente, F. J. (1992). La libertad sindical de jueces, magistrados y fis¬cales. Revista de Derecho Político, (35), https://doi.org/10.5944/ rdp.35.1992.8554.

Swepston, L. 1998. Human Rights Law and Freedom of Association: Development through ILO Supervision. International Labour Review, 137(2), pp. 169-194.

Tappert, W. 2019. Bewegte Geschichte – 110 Jahre Deutscher Richterbund. Deutsche Richterzeitung, (5), pp. 166-167.

Verzelloni, L. 2016. Au-delà des voix plurielles. Les nouvelles transformations du syndicalisme judiciaire en Espagne. Les Cahiers de la Justice, 3(3), pp. 489- 496, https://doi.org/10.3917/cdlj.1603.0489.

Weiss, M. 2004. Collective Representation in Labour Law in Germany. Mana¬gerial Law, 46(4/5), pp. 71-103, https://doi.org/10.1108/03090550410771125.

Zherobkina, Y., Maletov, D., Sevruk, Pavlenko, S. & Serbyn, N. 2021. Judge as a Public Servant. Journal of Law and Political Sciences, 29(4), pp. 240-260.

Internet Sources

Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct. 2002. Available at: https://www.icj.org/ wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Bangalore-Principles-of-Judicial-Conduct-in¬strument-2002-eng.pdf (8. 11. 2022).

Ceberio Belaza, M. 2013. Más de 2.000 jueces y fiscales secundan la huelga contra las reformas de Gallardón. Available at: https://elpais.com/polit-ica/2013/02/19/actualidad/1361305954_647889.html, (9. 11. 2022).

Council of Europe. 2020. Bulgaria-Questionnaire for the preparation of the CCJE Opinion No. 23. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/bulgaria-en-ccje-question¬naire-2020-bulgaria/16809f92e5, (5. 11. 2022).

Council of Europe. 2020. Greece-Questionnaire for the preparation of the CCJE Opinion No. 23. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/greece-en-reply/16809f9331, (5. 11. 2022).

Council of Europe. 2020. Louxembourg-Questionnaire pour la préparation de l’Avis No. 23 du CCJE, 2020. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/luxem¬bourg-fr-reply/16809f965d, (5. 11. 2022).

Deutscher Richterbund. 2018. Available at: Leistungen für Mitglieder - Deutscher Richterbund (DRB), (8. 11. 2022).

European Law Institute. 2021. Towards ELI-Mount Scopus European Stand¬ards of Judicial Independence. Available at: https://www.europeanlaw¬institute.eu/news-events/news-contd/news/towards-eli-mount-scop¬us-european-standards-of-judicial-independence/?tx_news_pi1%5B¬cont rol ler%5D=News&tx_news_pi1%5Bact ion%5D=detai l&¬cHash=235e7141385a529f88a83b657222d747, (9. 11. 2022).

Evropa Press. 2013. Los jueces cifran en un 62% el seguimiento de la huelga. Available at: https://www.expansion.com/2013/02/20/economia/polit-ica/1361348581.html (9. 11. 2022).

International Association of Judicial Independence and World Peace. 2008. Mount Scopus International Standards of Judicial Independence. Available at: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Mt-Scopus-Standards. pdf, (8. 11. 2022).

Pérez, F.J. 2018. La huelga de jueces y fiscales logra un amplio seguimiento. Avail¬able at: La huelga de jueces y fiscales logra un amplio seguimiento | Politica | EL PAÍS (elpais.com), (7. 11. 2022).

Pravna shvatanja, stavovi i zaključci Apelacionog suda u Beogradu / Odeljenje radnih sporova. 2015. Available at: http://www.bg.ap.sud.rs/cr/articles/sud¬ska-praksa/pravna-shvatanja-stavovi-i-zakljucci-apelacionog-suda-u-be¬ogradu/odeljenje-radnih-sporova/minuli-rad-za-sudije.html, (13. 11. 2022).

Recuero, M. 2018. Todos los jueces y fiscales acuerdan ir a la huelga el 19 de nov-iembre contra la gestión de Dolores Delgado. Available at: https://www. elmundo.es/espana/2018/11/05/5be01d21268e3edc7d8b45cf.html, (7. 11. 2022).

Villarejo, E. 2009. Debate on legality of judiciary strike. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Available at: Debate on legality of judiciary strike | Eurofound (europa.eu), (8. 11. 2022).

Ford, M.N. 2020. ‘Muzzle Law’ Ends Poland’s Ability to Call Itself a Democracy. Avail¬able at: https://theglobepost.com/2020/01/30/poland-muzzle-law/, (4. 11. 2022).

Legal Sources

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (10. 11. 2022).

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Adopted by Gen¬eral Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI) on 16 December 1966, Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/interna¬tional-covenant-civil-and-political-rights, (10. 11. 2022).

European Convention on Humans Rights (ECHR), Adopted by Council of Europe in 1950. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng. pdf, (10. 11. 2022).

Serbian Constitution, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Nos. 98/2006 and 115/2021.

Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland in der im Bundesgesetzblatt Teil III, Gliederungsnummer 100-1, veröffentlichten bereinigten Fassung, das zuletzt durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 28. Juni 2022 (BGBl. I S. 968) geändert worden ist.

Code du travail. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/ LEGITEXT000006072050/LEGISCTA000006145393/ (3. 11. 2022).

Constitución Española, BOE núm. 311, de 29/12/1978.

Organic Law of the Judiciary (Ley Orgánica 6/1985, de 1 de julio, del Poder Judi¬cial, BOE» núm. 157, de 02 de julio de 1985. Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial Última modificación: 28 de julio de 2022. Available at: https://www.boe.es/ biblioteca_juridica/abrir_pdf.php?id=PUB-PB-2022-150. (5. 11. 2022).

Loi Instaurant Un Conseil Consultatif De La Magistrature. - Coordination Offi¬cieuse En Langue Allemande. Service Public Federal Interieur 1999. Avail¬able at: https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi/article_body.pl?language=fr&-caller=summary&pub_date=12-03-05&numac=2012000113, (4. 11. 2022).

Наредба No. 8 от 8.11.2018 г. за организацията и дейността на Съвета за партньорство към Висшия съдебен съвет, Издадена от Висшия съде¬бен съвет, обн., ДВ, бр. 97 от 23.11.2018 г., изм. и доп., бр. 37 от 7.05.2019 г., доп., бр. 79 от 8.10.2019 г.

Case Law

European Court of Human Rights

Case of Baka v. Hungary, Application no. 20261/12, Judgement from 23 June 2016. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%¬2 2 f u l l t e x t%22 : [%22ba k a%22] ,%22do c ument c ol l e c t i on-id2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22ite mid%22:[%22001-163113%22]}

Case of Harabin v. Slovakia, Application no. 58688/11, Judgement from 20 February 2013. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22ite mid%22:[%22001-114666%22]}.

Case of Wille v. Liechtenstein, Application no. 28396/95, Judgement from 28 October 1999. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22%22CASE%20OF%20WILLE%20v.%20 LIECHTENSTEIN.

Case of Kudeshkina v. Russia, Application no. 29492/05, Judgement from 14 September 2009. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22kudeshkina%22],%22documentcollec-tionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22ite mid%22:[%22001-91501%22]}.

Case of N.F. v. Italy, Application no. 37119/97, Judgment from 12 December 2001. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22N.F.%20 v%20Italy%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAM-BER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-59622%22]}.

Case of Maestri v. Italy, Application no. 39748/98, Judgment from 17 February 2004. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22N.F.%20 v%20Italy%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAM-BER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-61638%22]}.

Case of Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria, Application no. 40072/13, Judgment from 19 January 2022. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22ite mid%22:[%22001-212376%22]}.

Case of Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v. Poland, Applications nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19, Judgment from 8 February 2022. Avail¬able at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22Dolin-ska%20Ficek%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAM-BER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-213200%22]}407

Court of Justice of the European Union

Case C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v. Tribunal de Contas, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2018.

Case C 658/18, UX v. Governo della Repubblica italiana, Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 July 2020

Other Sources

Consultative Council of European Judge. 2002. Opinion no. 23 on the role of the Associations of Judges in supporting the judicial independence. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Consultative Council of European Judge. 2002. Opinion no. 3 on the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the principles and rules governing judges’ professional conduct, in particular ethics, incom¬patible behavior and impartiality. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Consultative Council of European Judges. 2010. Magna Carta of Judges (Funda¬mental Principles). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Council of Europe. 1948. European Charter on the Statute for Judges and Explan¬atory Memorandum. Strasbourg.

Council of Europe. 2010. Recommendation CM/Rec (2010)12 on judges: independ-ence, efficiency and responsibilities. 2010. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Društvo sudija Srbije. 2022. Broj sudija u Srbiji, njihove plate u odnosu na stanje u državama članicama Saveta Evrope i predlozi za uspostavljanje efektivnih materijalnih garancija nezavisnosti sudstva. Beograd: Društvo sudija Srbije.

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). 2011. Report on the Rule of Law Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session, (Venice, 25-26) March.

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). 2016. Rule of Law Checklist, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 106th Ple¬nary Session (Venice, 11-12) March.

Human Rights Council. 2019. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the inde¬pendence of judges and lawyers from the 41st session 24 June–12 July 2019. Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development.

International Labor Office. 2014. Report of the Committee on Freedom of Asso¬ciation, 320th Session, Geneva, 13–27 March.408

International Labor Office. 2016. Report of the Committee on Freedom of Asso¬ciation, 326th Session, Geneva, 10–24 March.

Joint OSCE/ODIHR and Venice Commission Guidelines on Freedom of Associa¬tion. 2015. Helsinki: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 2020. Urgent Interim Opinion on the Bill Amending the Act on the Organization of Common Courts, the Act on the Supreme Court and Certain Other Acts of Poland (as of 20 December 2019).

United Nation Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary. 1985. Adopted on 6 September 1985 by the Seventh United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders held at Milan from 26 August to 6 September 1985.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2007. Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct.

Objavljeno
2023-01-26
Sekcija
Članci