Uoči godišnjice Dejtonskog mirovnog sporazuma: da li je sporazum bio suspendovan?
Glavni sadržaj članka
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9612-4133
Apstrakt
U ovom radu kritički su ispitane pravne i političke implikacije zakonodavnih aktivnosti koje je preduzeo visoki predstavnik (VP) u Bosni i Hercegovini (BiH), kao i naknadni institucionalni odgovori Republike Srpske. Analiza se fokusira na to da li te aktivnosti predstavljaju suspenziju Aneksa 10 Dejtonskog mirovnog sporazuma (DMS) i procenjuje se pravni osnov za ovlašćenja VP-a. Na osnovu detaljne analize relevantnih međunarodnih pravnih okvira, uključujući Bečku konvenciju o pravu ugovora (VCLT), u radu se ispituje prenos ovlašćenja sa Saveta bezbednosti Ujedinjenih nacija (SBUN) na VP-a i kontrola istih. Tvrdi se da nepostojanje podrške od strane SBUN-a za imenovanje gospodina Hansa Kristijana Fridriha Šmita potkopava legitimitet njegovih postupaka i usklađenost istih sa međunarodnim pravom. Osim toga, u studiji se ispituju i pravne kontramere koje je preduzela Republika Srpska, posebno Zakon iz 2023. godine kojim se odluke Visokog predstavnika isključuju iz zvaničnih publikacija RS, koji de fakto predstavlja delimičnu suspenziju Aneksa 10. U radu se takođe procenjuje da li postupci visokog predstavnika predstavljaju materijalno kršenje Dejtonskog mirovnog sporazuma, čime se opravdava odgovor Republike Srpske prema odredbama Bečke konvencije o pravu ugovora (VCLT). Ističe se urušavanje efektivne kontrole od strane Saveta bezbednosti UN nad Visokim predstavnikom i sve veća uloga domaćih institucija u okviru ustavnog okvira BiH. Ova analiza doprinosi aktuelnim debatama o međunarodnoj intervenciji, vladavini prava i ograničenjima spoljne uprave u postkonfliktnim društvima i pruža korisne uvide za naučnike, formulatore politike i pravne stručnjake koji se bave budućnošću Dejtonskog mirovnog sporazuma i mehanizama međunarodnog nadzora.
Preuzimanja
Detalji članka
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Reference
Bieber, F. 2013. CHAPTER 13. The Balkans: The Promotion of Power Sharing by Outsiders. In: Power Sharing in Deeply Divided Places. McEvoy J. & O'Leary B. (eds.), Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 312-326. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812207989.312.
Banning, T. 2015. The “Bonn Powers” of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 6(2), 27–58.
Brodlija, F. 2025. International Commercial Arbitration Law and Practice in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Lessons from Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Reform. Strani pravni život, (1), pp. 733-804. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_24417KJ
Dakić, D. T. 2024. United States Sanctions against Individuals in Republic of Srpska and Legal Remedies. Strani pravni život, (1), pp. 359-386. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_24303KJ
Whittle, D. 2015. The Limits of Legality and the United Nations Security Council: Applying the Extra-Legal Measures Model to Chapter VII Action. European Journal of International Law, 26(3), pp. 671–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv042
Džakić, T. B. 2023. Aporije postojanja i djelovanja visokog predstavnika u pravnom i političkom sistemu Bosne i Hercegovine. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke. 118(3), pp. 57-75. https://doi.org/10.5937/adpn2303057D
Edwards, L., & Worboys, J. 2021. The Interpretation and Implementation of Peace Agreements. In: Weller, M., Retter, M. & Varga A (eds.), International Law and Peace Settlements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108627856.007
Johnstone, I. 2003. Security Council Deliberations: The Power of the Better Argument. European Journal of International Law, 12(3), pp. 437–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/14.3.437
Öberg, M. D. 2005. The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ. European Journal of International Law, 16(5), pp. 879–906. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi151
Jamnejad, M. & Wood, M. 2009. The Principle of Non-intervention. Leiden Journal of International Law, 22, pp. 345-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509005858
Gaeta, P. 1996. The Dayton Agreements and International Law. European Journal of International Law, 7(2), pp. 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a015506
Legal Sources
Annex 10 to the Dayton Peace Agreement. Available at: https://www.osce.org/bih/126173, 26. 7. 2024.
Annex 4 to the Dayton Peace Agreement. Available at: https://www.osce.org/bih/126173, 26. 7. 2024.
Dayton Peace Agreement. Available at: https://www.osce.org/bih/126173, 26. 7. 2024.
Decision Enacting Amendments to the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Law on Amendments to the Election Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette of BiH, No. 67/22.
Decision Enacting the Law on Amendments to the Election Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette, No. 24/24.
Decision of the High Representative to Bosnia and Herzegovina No. 06/22. Available at: https://www.ohr.int/decisions-of-the-high-representative/, 26. 7. 2024.
Decision of the High Representative to Bosnia and Herzegovina No. 07/22. Available at: https://www.ohr.int/decisions-of-the-high-representative/, 26. 7. 2024.
European Commission for Democracy through Law - Venice Commission Opinion CDL-AD, 2005.
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/compass/the-european-convention-on-human-rights-and-its-protocols, 26. 7. 2024.
National Assembly of the Republic of Srpska, The conclusion regarding the high representative’s report on the civilian implementation of the peace agreement in BiH from 2009 to 2020, Official Gazette of the Republic of Srpska, No. 17/21.
The Conclusions of the Peace Implementation Conference in London. 1995. Available at: https://peacemaker.un.org/bosnialondonconference95, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Meeting (SC/14886). Available at: https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc14886.doc.htm, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Meeting (SC/15279). Available at: https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/2024, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Meeting (SC/15688). Available at: https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/2024, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Meeting (SC/15696). Available at: https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/2024, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1031. 1995. Available at https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un_documents_type/security-council-resolutions/?ctype=Bosnia%20%26amp%3B%20Herzegovina&cbtype=bosnia-herzegovina, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1088. 1996. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/229523?v=pdf, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1112. 1997. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/234622?v=pdf, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1144. 1997. Available at: https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un_documents_type/security-council-resolutions/?ctype=Bosnia%20%26amp%3B%20Herzegovina&cbtype=bosnia-herzegovina, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1256. 1999. Available at: http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/1256, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1396. 2002. Available at: http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/1396, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1722. 2006. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/587050?ln=en&v=pdf, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1764. 2007. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/602544?ln=zh_CN&v=pdf, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1869. 2009. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/650488/?v=pdf&ln=zh_CN, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 2604. 2021. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3946754?v=pdf, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 2658. 2022. Available at: https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un_documents_type/security-council-resolutions/?ctype=Bosnia%20%26amp%3B%20Herzegovina&cbtype=bosnia-herzegovina, 26. 7. 2024.
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 2706. 2023. Available at: https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un_documents_type/security-council-resolutions/?ctype=Bosnia%20%26amp%3B%20Herzegovina&cbtype=bosnia-herzegovina, 26. 7. 2024.
United Nations. Charter of the United Nations. 1945. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter, 26. 7. 2024.
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. Available at :https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf, 26. 7. 2024.
United Nations. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Treaty Series, 1969. Vol. 1155, p. 331.
Venice Commission Opinion CDL-AD. 2005. 004.
Case Law
Certain Expenses of the United Nations case (Certain Expenses of the United Nations) [1962] ICJ.
Conclusions of the Peace Implementation Conference held in Bonn on 9 and 10 December 1997.
Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Case No. U-27/22. Available at https://www.ustavnisud.ba/uploads/odluke/_en/U-27-22-1372210.pdf, 26. 7. 2024.
Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Case No. U-30/22. Available at https://www.ustavnisud.ba/uploads/odluke/_en/U-27-22-1372210.pdf 26. 7. 2024.
Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Case No. U-9/00. Available at https://www.ustavnisud.ba/uploads/odluke/_en/U-9-00-12134.pdf, 26. 7. 2024.
Draft Resolution S/2021/667 and the 8823rd UNSC meeting on July 22, 2021. Available at https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n21/200/87/pdf/n2120087.pdf?token=VKtnGHeAGpePk0RDI1&fe=true, 26. 7. 2024.
Dušan Berić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, ECtHR Application Nos. 36357/04 et al., Decision as to the Admissibility of 16 October 2007.
East Timor (Portugal v. Australia) [1995] ICJ Rep 90.
Nicaragua v. United States (ICJ, Nicaragua v. United States of America, Military and Paramilitary Activities, Judgement of 27 June 1986, Merits, Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org, 26. 7. 2024.