NOVI PRAVNI OKVIR O STARATELJSTVU U NEMAČKOJ U SVETLU KONVENCIJE O PRAVIMA OSOBA SA INVALIDITETOM: UZOR ZA DRUGE ZEMLJE?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_25308KJKljučne reči:
poslovna sposobnost, osobe sa invaliditetom, nemačka reforma starateljstva 2021Apstrakt
Cilj ovog rada jeste da analizira novu nemačku legislativu o starateljstvu u odnosu na standarde postavljene Konvencijom o pravima osoba sa invaliditetom, sa posebnim naglaskom na član 12, koji se odnosi na prava osoba sa invaliditetom u pogledu poslovne sposobnosti. Autor ističe da, iako reformisana legislativa nije u potpunosti usklađena sa Konvencijom ujedinjenih nacija o pravima osoba sa invaliditetom, budući da postoje izuzeci u odnosu na „standard“ odlučivanja uz podršku, postoji jasna namera zakonodavca da ojača individualna prava, stavi veći naglasak na promovisanje struktura odlučivanja uz podršku izvan instituta starateljstva i da naglasi da se i starateljstvo i mere podrške moraju zasnivati na volji i željama pojedinca, što svakako predstavlja korak u pravom smeru. Sam proces reforme takođe može poslužiti kao primer drugim državama, jer je reforma bila pažljivo planirana i zasnovana na obimnim empirijskim i doktrinarnim istraživanjima postojećih nedostataka u pravnom sistemu i praksi, te nesumnjivo predstavlja dobar model na koji mogu da se ugledaju druge zemlje.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Arstein-Kerslake, A. & Flynn, E. 2015. The General Comment on Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Roadmap for Equality Before the Law, The International Journal of Human Rights, pp. 471-490. Doi: 10.1080/13642987.2015.1107052.
Beker, K. & Lepojević, V. 2021. Reforma sistema starateljstva nad odraslim osobama (Poslovna sposobnost). Inicijativa za prava osoba sa mentalnim invaliditetom MDRI-S.
Brosey, D. 2020. Aspects of the Discussion Regarding the Reform of the German Legislation of Betreuung in Light of the UN-CRPD. JULGAR. 41, pp. 199–212.
Brosey, D., Engels, D. & Köller, R. 2016. Qualität in der rechtlichen Betreuung. Isg - Institut Für Sozialforschung Und Gesellschaftspolitik Gmbh. Available at: https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Fachpublikationen/1_Zwischenbericht_Qualitaet_Betreuung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4, 10. 8. 2025.
Brosey, D. 2015. BETREUUNG - A Legal Perspective on supported and substitute decision making regarding Article 12, In: Coester-Waltjen, D, Volker, L, Donovan, W. M, Waters, Q.C. (eds), Liber Amicorum Makoto Arai, Nomos, 1 Edition, pp. 125-141.
Callus, A. M. 2018. Removing obstacles to equal recognition for persons with intellectual disability: taking exception to the way things are. Alter: European Journal of Disability Research. 12 (3), pp. 153-165. Doi: 10.1016/j.alter.2018.03.001.
Carney, T. 2017. Australian Guardianship Tribunals: An Adequate Response to CRPD Disability Rights Recognition and Protection of the Vulnerable over the Lifecourse?. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 10.
Carney, T. 2015. Supported Decision-Making for People with Cognitive Impairments: An Australian Perspective? Laws, 4(1), Sydney Law School Research Paper 15/03, pp. 37-59, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2556636, 5. 9. 2025.
Craigie, J., Bach, M., Gurbai, S., Kanter, A., Kim, S., Lewis, O. & Morgan, G. 2019. Legal capacity, mental capacity and supported decision-making: Report from a panel event. Int J Law Psychiatry, 62, pp. 160-168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.09.006.
Craigie, J. 2015. A fine balance: reconsidering patient autonomy in light of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Bioethics 2015/29, pp. 398–405.
Duffy, J. 2023. Mental Capacity, Dignity and the Power of International Human Rights, Cambridge University Press.
Glušac, L. 2022. Razvoj ideje o nacionalnim institucijama za ljudska prava: od prve skice do ženevskih smernica (1946–1978), Strani pravni život, 66(1), pp. 59-74. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/spz66-36226.
Gooding, P. 2013. Supported Decision-Making: A Rights-Based Disability Concept and Its Implications for Mental Health Law. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(3), pp. 431-451.
Henking, T. 2022. Die Reform des Betreuungsrechts. Der Nervenarzt, 2022, pp. 1-6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01355-6.
Flynn, E., Arstein-Kerslake, A. 2014. The Support Model of Legal Capacity: Fact, Fiction, or Fantasy?. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 23(1), pp. 124–125.
Jovic Prlainovic, O. 2020. Međunarodni standardi u nacionalnom sistemu poslovne sposobnosti osoba sa invaliditetom, In: Ćeranić, D. (ed.), Pravo, tradicija i promjene, Istočno Sarajevo, pp. 89-107.
Independent International. 2014. Independent but Not Alone, A Global report on the Right to Decide, Inclusion international. Available at: https://s38312.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/Independent-But-Not-Alone_-final.pdf, 5. 9. 2025.
IGES Institut. 2018. Umsetzung des Erforderlichkeitsgrundsatzes in der betreuungsrechtlichen Praxis unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rolle der Betreuungsbehörden. Berlin: Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz (BMJV). Available at: https://www.bmj.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Fachpublikationen/IGES_Abschlussbericht_Erforderlichkeitsgrundsatz_BandI_II.html, 5. 9. 2025.
Krstić, I. & Beker, K. 2017. Situaciona analiza: poslovna sposobnost i osobe sa invaliditetom u Srbiji. Izveštaj sa projekta Poslovna sposobnost kao preduslov ravnopravnosti osoba sa invaliditetom pred zakonom finansiranog od strane EU.
Lewis, O. 2011. Advancing legal capacity jurisprudence. European Human Rights Law Review, 6, pp. 700-714.
Lurie, G. 2020. Proportionality and the Right to Equality. German Law Journal, 2020;21(2), pp. 174-196. Available at: doi:10.1017/glj.2020.8
Markovic, M. 2012. Poslovna sposobnost kao univerzalno ljudsko pravo i determinanta društvenog položaja lica sa mentalnim invaliditetom, Stanovništvo 2/2012, pp. 65-83. Doi: 10.2298/STNV1202065M.
Minkowitz, T. 2010. Abolishing Mental Health Laws to Comply with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In: Perlin, M. L. (ed.), Mental Health and Human Rights: Vision, Praxis, and Courage. Oxford University Press, pp. 157-174.
Minkowitz, T. 2017. The Reception of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the United States (New York), Mexico, and Peru. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2902629, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2902629.
Molovic, M. 2023. Prilika za ravnopravnost: analiza kvota za zapošljavanje osoba sa invaliditetom u Srbiji i državama regiona. Strani pravni život, 67(3), pp. 551-565. https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_23310KJ.
Ohlin, J. D. & May, L. 2016. Necessity and the Use of Force in International Law. Necessity in International Law. New York: online edn, Oxford Academic, pp. 39-64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190622930.003.0003, 5. 9. 2025.
Pozón, S. R. 2016. The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and mental health law: A critical review. ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research, pp. 301-309. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2016.07.001, 5. 9. 2025.
Quinn, G. 2010. Personhood & Legal Capacity: Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift of Article 12 CRPD. Paper presented at the HPOD Conference, Harvard Law School. Available at: https://www.fedvol.ie/_fileupload/Research/NDE%20Reading%20Lists/Harvard%20legal%20Capacity%20gq%20draft%202%20Gerard%20Quinn%20Feb%202010.pdf, 5. 9. 2025.
Szmukler, G. 2019. 'Capacity', 'Best Interests', 'Will and Preferences' and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. World Psychiatry 18(1), pp. 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20584
Scholten, M., Gather, J. & Vollmann, J. 2021. Equality in the Informed Consent Process: Competence to Consent, Substitute Decision-Making, and Discrimination of Persons with Mental Disorders. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 46, pp. 108–136, doi:10.1093/jmp/jhaa030.
Scholten, M. 2018. Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward. Journal of Medical Ethics, 4(4), pp. 226-233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/MEDETHICS-2017-104414
Schnellenbach, A., Normann-Scheerer, S., Giers, M. & Thielke, U. 2023. Betreuungrecht für die Praxis - Das neue Recht ab 1.1.2023, FamRZ- Buch 3.
Stanković, G. 2014. Nova zakonska rešenja u produženju roditeljskog prava. Pravo - teorija i praksa, 10–12, pp. 1-16.
Stefanović, L. & Beauchamp, E. 2019. Kanadski modeli odlučivanja uz podršku kao moguća alternativa režimu starateljstva u Srbiji. Inicijativa za prava osoba sa mentalnim invaliditetom MDRI-S, https://www.mdri-s.org/public/documents/upload/poslovna-sposobnost/Kanadski%20modeli%20odlučivanja%20uz%20podršku%20kao%20moguća%20alternativa%20režimu%20starateljstva%20u%20srbiji.pdf, 5. 9. 2025.
Škorić, M. 2020. The Twenty-First Century – the Beginning of a New Era in the Protection of Human Rights of Persons with Mental Health Disabilities, Pravni vjesnik, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 27-45.
Welti, F., Ganner, M., Rieder, E. & Voithofer, C. (Hrsg.) 2021. Die Umsetzung der UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention in Österreich und Deutschland. Innsbruck: University Press.
Legal Sources
Care Organisation Act of 4 May 2021, Federal Law Gazette I p. 882, 917, last amended by Article 2 of the Act of 20 December 2023, Federal Law Gazette 2023 I No. 391.
Civil Code in the version promulgated on 2 January 2002, Federal Law Gazette I page 42, 2909; 2003 I page 738, as last amended by Article 1 of the Act of July 17, 2025, Federal Law Gazette 2025 I No. 163.
Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG), Decision of 20 January 2015 – 1 BvR 1065/13.
The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Report, 2023, Concluding observations on the combined second and third periodic reports of Germany, CRPD/C/DEU/CO/2-3, October 2023, Available at: https://docs.un.org/en/CRPD/C/DEU/CO/2-3, 5. 9. 2025.
The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2014. General Comment No. 1: Article 12: Equality Before the Law. Available at: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/ Download.aspx?symbolno=CRPD/C/GC/1&Lang=en, 5. 9. 2025. .
Law on Reform of the Guardianship and Custody, Official Gazette 2021, Part I, No. 21, issued in Bonn on 12 May 2021.
United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities, 5. 9. 2025.
Internet Sources
TH Köln. 2025. Rechtliche Betreuung in Deutschland: Gutes Niveau mit strukturellen Defiziten. Available at: https://www.th-koeln.de/hochschule/rechtliche-betreuung-in-deutschland-gutes-niveau-mit-strukturellen-defiziten_55174.php, 5. 9. 2025.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2025 Aleksandra Rabrenovic

Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.