ANALIZA NEZAVISNOSTI SUDIJA MEĐUNARODNOG SUDA PRAVDE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_25101KJKljučne reči:
nezavisnost sudija, Međunarodni sud pravde, garancije nezavisnosti.Apstrakt
Autor analizira položaj sudija Međunarodnog suda pravde. Na početku ukazuje na važnost nezavisnosti za zaštitu prava subjekata u postupku, a zatim prelazi na formalno-pravne garancije nezavisnosti sudija ovog suda. Iznosi se tumačenje normi koje se odnose na nezavisnost sudstva, a naročito se ističe nemogućnost ravnomerne zastupljenosti sudija iz različitih država s obzirom na to da stalne članice Saveta bezbednosti uvek imaju sudiju ovog suda. Primećeno je da neke važne države članice Ujedinjenih nacija nikada u istoriji nisu imale sudiju ovog suda. Izneto je i više primera iz prakse Suda koji se tiču neposredno ili posredno nezavisnosti sudija. Istaknuto je da je potrebno promeniti proceduru izbora sudija kako bi se umanjio politički uticaj, pre svih Saveta bezbednosti, prilikom izbora koji ima efekta i kasnije tokom rada sudija. Ukazano je na statistiku koja se odnosi na glasanje sudija s obzirom na državljanstvo ili imajući u vidu članstvo država u nekim važnim međunarodnim organizacijama. Naročita pažnja posvećena je mehanizmima koji obezbeđuju nezavisnost u smislu kontrole i preispitivanja njihove nezavisnosti. Na kraju su dati konkretni predlozi kojima bi se unapredila nezavisnost sudija Međunarodnog suda pravde.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Elias, T. O. & Jennings, R. 1974. Report: Does the International Court of Justice, as it is Presently Shaped, Correspond to the Requirements which Follow from its Functions as the Central Judicial Body of the International Community? In: Mosler, H. & Bernhardt, R. (eds.). Judicial Settlement of International Disputes : International Court of Justice, other courts and tribunals, arbitration and conciliation; an international symposium. Springer.
Ginsburg, T. 2005. Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking. Virginia Journal of International Law , 45(3), pp. 631-673.
Giorgetti, C. 2015. The Challenge and Recusal of Judges of the International Court of Justice. In: Giorgetti, C. (ed.), Challenges and Recusals of Judges and Arbitrators in International Courts and Tribunals 3. Leiden, Boston: Brill, pp. 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004302129_003
Hensley, T. 1968. National Bias and the International Court of Justice. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 12(4), pp. 568-586. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110296
Hernández, G. 2012. Impartiality and Bias at the International Court of Justice. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, (1)3, pp. 183-207. https://doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.01.03.62
Katz Cogan, J. 2008. Competition and Control in International Adjudication. Virginia Journal of International Law, 48(2), pp. 411-449.
Lachs, M. 1987. A Few Thoughts on the Independence of Judges of the International Court of Justice, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 25, pp. 593-600.
Posner, E. & Figueiredo, M. 2005. Is the International Court of Justice Biased?. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), pp. 599-630. https://doi.org/10.1086/430765
Rovine, A. 1976. The National Interest and the World Court. In: Gross, L. (ed.), The Future of the International Court of Justice. Dobbs Ferry, New York: Oceana, pp. 313-335.
Samore, W. 1956. National Origins v. Impartial Decisions: A Study of World Court Holdings. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 34(3), pp. 193-221.
Shetreet, S. & Forsyth, C. (eds.). 2012. The Culture of Judicial Independence Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004188334.i-639
Smith, A. 2005. Judicial Nationalism. Texas International Law Journal, 40(2), pp. 197-212.
Suh, I. R. 1969. Voting Behaviour of National Judges in International Courts. The American Journal of International Law (AJIL), 63(2), pp. 224-236. https://doi.org/10.2307/2197412
Terry, G. 1975. Factional Behaviour on the International Court of Justice: An Analysis of the First and Second Courts (1945-1951) and the Sixth and Seventh Courts (1961-1967). Melbourne University Law Review, 10(1), pp. 59-117.
Weiss, E. B. 1987. Judicial Independence and Impartiality: A Preliminary Inquiry. In: Damrosch, L. F. (ed.), The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads. Ardsley, NY: Transnational, pp. 123-154.
Zeitune, J. 2004. International Principles on the Independence and Accountability of Judges, Lawyers and Prosecutors: A Practitioners Guide. Practitioners Guide Series No. 1. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists.
Pravni izvori
Generalna skupština Ujedinjenih nacija. res. 50/181 (1995), 48/137 (1993)Human rights in the administration of justice.
Statut Međunarodnog suda pravde (International Court of Justice - ICJ). Dostupno na: https://www.icj-cij.org/statute, 25. 1. 2025.
Ujedinjene nacije (Sedmi kongres o prevenciji zločina i tretiranju prestupnika). Osnovna načela o nezavisnosti sudstva (1985). Dostupno na: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-independence-judiciary, 25. 1. 2025.
Sudska praksa
ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), 2007, General List No. 91. Dostupno na: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/91, 25. 1. 2025.
ICJ, Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v. Australia), 1992, I.C.J. Reports 1992, p. 240. Dostupno na: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/80, 25. 1. 2025.
ICJ, Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo - Advisory Opinion - The Court finds that the declaration of independence of Kosovo adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate intenational law. Dostupno na: https://www.icj-cij.org/node/101885. 25. 1. 2025.
ICJ, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 2004, I. C. J. Reports 2004, p. 136. Dostupno na: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/131, 25. 1. 2025.
ICJ, Arbitral Award Made by the King of Spain on 23 December 1906 (Honduras v. Nicaragua), 1960, I.C.J. Reports 1960, p. 192. Dostupno na: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/39, 25. 1. 2025.
Izvori sa interneta
Posner, E. & Figueiredo M. 2004. Is the International Court of Justice Biased?. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 234. University of Chicago Law School, pp. 1-43. Dostupno na: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics/290/, 25. 1. 2025.
