MEĐUNARODNA INVESTICIONA ARBITRAŽA – IZ PERSPEKTIVE REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE

Autori

  • Paula Poretti Univerzitet Josip Juraj Strossmayer u Osijeku, Pravni fakultet
  • Mirela Župan Univerzitet Josip Juraj Strossmayer u Osijeku, Pravni fakultet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_24412KJ

Ključne reči:

Hrvatska, pravo EU, strane investicije, ICSID, međunarodni investicioni sporovi.

Apstrakt

Od uspostavljanja Hrvatske kao suverene zemlje početkom 90-ih, strane investicije su izdvojene kao strateški prioritet ekonomske politike zemlje. Hrvatska nastoji da obezbedi stabilno pravno okruženje za strane investitore, kako kroz svoja domaća pravila, tako i kroz pravo EU, te bilateralne investicione ugovore. Pružanje pravne zaštite u međunarodnim investicionim sporovima predstavlja jedan od izazovnijih zadataka, jer zahteva pažljivo balansiranje između zaštite interesa privatnog investitora i javnog interesa u državi ulaganja. Poveravanje ovog zadatka ad hoc arbitražnim sudovima predmet je sve većih kritika, što dovodi do zaključka da su karakteristike koje razlikuju arbitražu od sudskog postupka istovremeno i njeni najveći nedostaci. Na tragu tog razmišljanja i nakon slučaja Achmea, sve više se zagovara uspostavljanje posebnog suda EU za međunarodne investicione sporove. U ovom radu fokus je, međutim, na pitanju rešavanja investicionih sporova pred ICSID-om u kojima je Hrvatska uključena bilo kao tužena strana ili kao matična država u poslednjih pola decenije.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Reference

Babić, P. 2012. Pravičan i pošten tretman ulaganja u međunarodnom investicijskom pravu. In: Sikirić, H. et al. (eds.), Liber amicorum Krešimir Sajko. Zagreb: Sveučilište u Zagrebu, pp. 375-395.

Behn, D., Langford, M. & Létourneau-Tremblay, L. 2020. Empirical Perspectives on Investment Arbitration: What Do We Know? Does It Matter? Journal of World Investment & Trade, 21(2-3), pp. 188-250. https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340172

Borovikov, E., Evtimov, B. & Crevon-Tarassova, A. 2016. European Union. In: Carter, J. J. (ed.), The International Arbitration Review. London : Law Business Research , pp. 186-195.

Dika, M. 2016. Marginalije uz nagoviještene pravce reforme Hrvatskog arbitražnog prava. In: Varadi, T. et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Gašo Knežević. Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Udruženje za arbitražno pravo, pp. 372-408.

International Bar Association. 2018. Subcommittee on Investment Treaty Arbitration, Consistency, Efficiency and Transparency in Investment Treaty Arbitration Report (IBA Report, 2018).

Marošević, K. & Romić, J. 2011. Strana izravna ulaganja u funkciji razvitka Vukovarsko-srijemske županije. Ekonomski vjesnik, XXIV(1), pp. 155-169.

Meijer Dusman, F. 2012. Responsibility of State for Acts of Local Authorities which Constitute Breaches of Bilateral Investment Treaties. Croatian Arbitration Yearbook, 19, pp. 167-182.

Muhvić, D. 2016. Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in Investment Treaties and General International Law. In: Primorac, Ž. et al. (eds.), Economic and Social Development (Book of Proceedings), 16th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – “Legal Challenges of Modern World”. Varaždin, Split, Koprivnica, pp. 33-42.

Pečarić, M., Jakovac, P. & Miličić, M. 2020. Utjecaj priljeva stranog kapitala na ekonomski rast zemlje primateljice: Hrvatska u krilu bogova? In: Tomljenović, M. (ed.), Suvremeni izazovi EU, Republike Hrvatske i zemalja Zapadnog Balkana. Rijeka: Sveučilište u Rijeci, Ekonomski fakultet, pp. 133-150.

Petrović, S. & Ceronja, P. 2012. Croatia. In: Shan, W. (ed), The Legal Protection of Foreign Investment-A Comparative Study, Hart Publishing, pp. 287-312.

Sajko, K. 2009. Međunarodno privatno pravo. Zagreb: Narodne novine.

Sornarajah, M. 1999. The international law of foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.

Uzelac, A. & Nagy, T. 2011. Croatia. In: Liebscher, C. & Fremuth-Wolf, A. (eds.), Arbitration Law and Practice in Central and Eastern Europe. JurisNet, pp. 165-278.

Župan, M. & Čuljak, A. M. 2019. Investment Arbitration in Croatia. In: Nagy, I. C. (ed.) Investment Arbitration in Central and Eastern Europe: Law and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 68-94. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788115179.00012

Vuković, Đ. & Kunštek, E. 2005. Međunarodno građansko postupovno pravo. Zagreb: Zgombić i Partneri.

Legal sources

Companies Act, 1993. Official Gazette, no. 111/93, 34/99, 121/99, 52/00, 118/03, 107/07, 146/08, 137/09, 125/11, 152/11, 111/12, 68/13, 110/15, 40/19, 34/22, 114/22, 18/23, 130/23.

Arbitration Act, 2001. Official Gazette, no. 88/01.

Constitution of Republic of Croatia, 1990. Official Gazette, no. 56/90, 135/97, 8/98, 113/00, 124/00, 28/01, 41/01, 55/01, 76/10, 85/10, 05/14.

Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 1965 (ICSID Convention).

Report of the State Attorney General of the Republic of Croatia on the work of the State Attorney’s Offices in 2023 (Report of the SAG, 2023), Zagreb, 2024.

Report of the State Attorney General of the Republic of Croatia on the work of the State Attorney’s Offices in 2021 (Report of the SAG, 2021), Zagreb, 2022.

State Attorney’s Office Act of the Republic of Croatia (SAOA).

State Attorney’s Office Rules of Procedure of the Republic of Croatia (SAORP).

Case Law

Adria Beteiligung v. The Republic of Croatia, UNCITRAL.

Case C-284/16 Slowakische Republik (Slovak Republic) v. Achmea BV, Court of Justice of the European Union of 6 March 2018, ECLI:EU:C:2018:158.

ICC (International Chamber of Commerce), Tvornica Šećera v. Serbia.

ICSID, HEP v. Slovenia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/24.

ICSID, Van Riet v. Croatia, Case No. ARB/13/12.

ICSID, Elitech B.V. and Golf Development Ltd. v Croatia, Case No. ARB/17/32.

ICSID, Erste Group Bank AG, Steiermaerkische Bank und Sparkasse AG and Erste & Steiermaerkische v. Croatia, Case No. ARB/17/49.

ICSID, MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Company Plc v. Republic of Croatia (I), Case No: ARB/13/32.

ICSID, MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Public Limited Company v. Republic of Croatia, Case No. ARB/24/19.

ICSID, Raiffeisen Bank International AG and Raiffeisen Bank Austria d.d., v. Croatia, Case No. ARB/17/34.

Pren Nreka v. Czech Republic, UNCITRAL.

Ulemek v. Croatia, Application no. 21613/16.

Internet Sources

Croatian Ministry of Economy. 2024. Available at: https://investcroatia.gov.hr/o-hrvatskoj-2/, 4. 9. 2024.

DORH. 2024. State Attorney’s Office of the Republic of Croatia. Available at: https://dorh.hr/en, 25. 11. 2024.

ICSID. 2024. Cases Databases. Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/cases/case-database, 25. 11. 2024.

INDEX.HR. 2023. Available at: https://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/udruga-franak-ako-je-nagodba-s-bankama-korisna-zasto-je-onda-vlada-ne-objavi/2427768.aspx, 25. 11. 2024.

Ministry of Finance. 2024. Available at: https://www.porezna-uprava.hr/bi/Stranice/Dvostruko-oporezivanje.aspx, 4. 9. 2024.

NACIONAL.HR. 2023. Available at: https://www.nacional.hr/tajni-dokument-otkriva-kako-su-plenkovic-i-maric-stali-na-stranu-banaka-u-slucaju-franak/#google_vignette, 25. 11. 2024.

UNCTAD. 2024. Available at: https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/countries/51/croatia, 4. 9. 2024.

World Bank Group. 2024. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/?locations=HR-XT, 4. 9. 2024.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

18.02.2025

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

Članci